The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The need for end-of-life care training in nephrology: national survey results of nephrology fellows
Abstract
Because of the high mortality rate of end-stage renal disease, nephrologists care for many dying patients. However, the education of nephrology fellows in palliative care has not been assessed. We surveyed second-year nephrology fellows to assess the quantity and quality of teaching they received in palliative medicine and also asked about their preparedness to manage patients at the end of life. A 63% survey response rate yielded 173 surveys for evaluation. Nearly all fellows (99%) agreed that physicians have a responsibility to help patients at the end of life; half thought it was very important to learn how to care for dying patients. On a 10-point scale in which 0 is no teaching and 10 is a lot of teaching, fellows reported significantly less teaching in end-of-life care (mean score, 3.8 +/- 2.6) than in managing a patient with distal renal tubular acidosis (mean score, 6.3 +/- 2.5) or on hemodialysis therapy (mean score, 8.9 +/- 1.5; all P < 0.0001). Specific palliative care content areas were taught infrequently; only 22% of fellows were taught how to tell a patient he or she is dying. Fellows who had contact with a palliative care specialist reported more education on end-of-life issues and believed they were better prepared to provide such care. Fellows' palliative care experiences during fellowship frequently occurred without attending nephrologist supervision; 32% of fellows had conducted 2 or fewer family meetings, and 26% of all family meetings occurred without an attending nephrologist. Fellows believed they were best prepared to manage a patient on hemodialysis therapy (mean score, 8.9 +/- 1) and least prepared to manage a patient at the end of life (mean score, 6.1 +/- 2; P < 0.0001). Our results show that most nephrology fellows believe they should learn how to care for dying patients, but most fellowship programs do not offer this training. Our study therefore suggests that training in palliative care be incorporated into fellowship program curricula.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Studies show there is substantial variation in attitudes toward and practice of end-of-life decision making among nephrologists, although these differences seem to be lessening over time [36,37].”
From Should there be an expanded role for palliative care in end-stage renal disease? (2010) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
Institute of Medicine (1997) · National Academies Press eBooks · doi:10.17226/5801 · Cited by 1,079
Decisions near the end of life: professional views on life-sustaining treatments.
Solomon, M. Z., O’Donnell, L. N., Jennings, B., Guilfoy, V., Wolf, S. M., Nolan, K., Jackson, R., Koch‐Weser, D., & Donnelley, S. (1993) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.1.14 · Cited by 580
HODGES, B., REGEHR, G., & MARTIN, D. (2001) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200110001-00029 · Cited by 280
Decisions near the end of life.
(2010) · PubMed · Cited by 205
Danis, M., Federman, D. D., Fins, J. J., Fox, E., Kastenbaum, B. K., Lanken, P. N., Long, K., Lowenstein, E., Lynn, J., Rouse, F., et al. (1999) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/00003246-199909000-00047 · Cited by 175
Cohen, L. M., Moss, A. H., Weisbord, S. D., & Germain, M. J. (2006) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.9.977 · Cited by 128
Self-citationDialysis Patients' Preferences for Family-Based Advance Care Planning
Hines, S. C., Glover, J. J., Holley, J. L., Babrow, A. S., Badzek, L., & Moss, A. H. (1999) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-130-10-199905180-00016 · Cited by 103
Self-citationIncorporating palliative care into primary care education
Block, S. D., Bernier, G. M., Crawley, L. M., Farber, S. J., Kuhl, D. R., Nelson, W. A., O’Donnell, J., Sandy, L. G., & Ury, W. A. (1998) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00230.x · Cited by 98
Self-citationPhysiciansʼ Ratings of Their Knowledge, Attitudes, and End-of-life-care Practices
Bradley, E. H., Cramer, L. D., Bogardus, S. T., Kasl, S. V., Johnson‐Hürzeler, R., & Horwitz, S. M. (2002) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-200204000-00009 · Cited by 95
Academia's Chilly Climate for Primary Care
Block, S. D. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540090023006 · Cited by 94
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- 2001, Excerpts from the USRDS 2001 Annual Data Report, Am J Kidney Dis, 38, S1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Communication About Serious Illness Care Goals: A Review and Synthesis of Best Practices
Bernacki, R. E., & Block, S. D. (2014) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271 · Cited by 1,422
Self-citationRetooling for an aging America: building the health care workforce
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5066 · Cited by 688
Davison, S. N., Levin, A., Moss, A. H., Jha, V., Brown, E. A., Brennan, F. P., Murtagh, F. E., Naicker, S., Germain, M. J., O'Donoghue, D. J., et al. (2015) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2015.110 · Cited by 583
Self-citationUtility of the “Surprise” Question to Identify Dialysis Patients with High Mortality
Moss, A. H., Ganjoo, J., Sharma, S., Gansor, J., Senft, S., Weaner, B. B., Dalton, C., Mackay, K., Pellegrino, B. S., Anantharaman, P., et al. (2008) · Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.2215/cjn.00940208 · Cited by 343
Self-citationBarsuk, J. H., Ahya, S. N., Cohen, E. R., McGaghie, W. C., & Wayne, D. B. (2009) · American Journal of Kidney Diseases · doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.12.041 · Cited by 167
Metadata
- Authors
- Holley, J. L., Carmody, S. S., Moss, A. H., Sullivan, A. M., Cohen, L. M., Block, S. D., & Arnold, R. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia Health System (US)
- University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
- West Virginia University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Baystate Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holley, Jean L
- Venue
- American Journal of Kidney Diseases
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 813-820
- ISSN
- 0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054749331
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 15
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Kidney Diseases (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- end-of-life care, palliative care, nephrology fellowship training, nephrology fellows, end-stage renal disease, physician preparedness, palliative care curriculum, family meetings
- MeSH terms
- Data Collection, Demography, Fellowships and Scholarships, Female, Humans, Male, Nephrology, Palliative Care, Teaching, Terminal Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review