Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 164

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin on Renal Function in Chronic Renal Failure Predialysis Patients

Open access
Roth, David, Smith, Ronald D., Schulman, Gerald, Steinman, Theodore I., Hatch, Fred E., Rudnick, Michael R., Sloand, James A., Freedman, Barry I., Williams, Winfred W., Shadur, Craig A., Benz, Robert L., Teehan, Brendan P., Revicki, Dennis A., Sarokhan, Brenda J., Abels, Robert I.·1994·American Journal of Kidney Diseases

Abstract

A study was undertaken to ascertain the effects of recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) on renal function in chronic renal failure predialysis patients. The effect of improvement of anemia by r-HuEPO on the rate of decline in renal function in predialysis patients has not been previously studied prospectively in a large number of patients using reliable measures of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). To investigate the efficacy, safety, and impact of r-HuEPO therapy in chronic renal insufficiency patients, a 48-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter study was initiated in 83 anemic, predialysis (serum creatinine 3 to 8 mg/dL) patients. Serial GFRs were measured using 125I-iothalamate clearance. Forty patients were randomized to the untreated arm and 43 patients to the treatment arm (50 U/kg r-HuEPO subcutaneously three times weekly). Baseline characteristics were comparable for the r-HuEPO-treated and untreated groups. During this 48-week study, GFR, mean arterial blood pressure, and daily protein intake were not significantly different between the two groups. There was a statistically significant increase in hematocrit for the r-HuEPO-treated group that was not associated with acceleration of deterioration in residual renal function. This was demonstrated by the lack of a significant (P = 0.376) between-group difference in mean change in GFR from baseline to last available value for the r-HuEPO-treated (-2.1 +/- 3.2 mL/min) and untreated (-2.8 +/- 3.5 mL/min) groups. This study concludes that r-HuEPO therapy improves anemia in predialysis patients and does not accelerate the rate of progression to end-stage renal disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80671-8

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 164

Metadata

Authors
Roth, D., Smith, R. D., Schulman, G., Steinman, T. I., Hatch, F. E., Rudnick, M. R., Sloand, J. A., Freedman, B. I., Williams, W. W., Shadur, C. A., Benz, R. L., Teehan, B. P., Revicki, D. A., Sarokhan, B. J., & Abels, R. I.
Venue
American Journal of Kidney Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-11
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
777-784
ISSN
0272-6386 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140623175
Cited by
164
References
0
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin on Renal Function in Chronic Renal Failure Predialysis Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80671-8
The paper
Roth, D., Smith, R. D., Schulman, G., Steinman, T. I., Hatch, F. E., Rudnick, M. R., Sloand, J. A., Freedman, B. I., Williams, W. W., Shadur, C. A., Benz, R. L., Teehan, B. P., Revicki, D. A., Sarokhan, B. J., & Abels, R. I. (1994). Effects of Recombinant Human Erythropoietin on Renal Function in Chronic Renal Failure Predialysis Patients. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80671-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.