The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research
Abstract
The concept of postponement is increasingly drawing the attention of researchers and practitioners. Postponement means delaying activities in the supply chain until customer orders are received with the intention of customizing products, as opposed to performing those activities in anticipation of future orders. This paper reviews the literature on postponement dating back to 1965, and puts it in a systematic framework. In light of the classification of the literature developed, opportunities are identified for integration and cross‐fertilization between research papers in disciplines such as logistics and operations management and between the variety of research methods used. Some directions for research (in terms of content and methodology) are then formulated. For instance, the development of a more integrated supply chain perspective on postponement, and the application of triangulation rather than single methods. Specific research activities to meet these challenges are suggested in the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“Not only is it a good way to mix qualitative and quantitative methods, but it also leads to robust results and potentially to cross-method synergies (Jick, 1979).”
Background
Cited by
Integrating the Supply Chain … 25 years on
Stevens, G. C., & Johnson, M. (2016) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-07-2015-0175 · Cited by 328
Design and control of warehouse order picking: A literature review
de Koster, R., Le-Duc, T., & Roodbergen, K. J. (2007) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.07.009 · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- van Hoek, R. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-184
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W2103050664
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(00)00057-7
- The paper
- van Hoek, R. I. (2001). The rediscovery of postponement a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(00)00057-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.