The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis model of manufacturing capabilities
Abstract
Recent research in operations strategy has focused on showing the extent to which manufacturing's competence in developing and executing one or more competitive capabilities affects the organization's overall business performance. Several of those efforts have produced models, such as the ‘sand cone’, that suggest an ideal sequence in which manufacturing capabilities should be developed. However, efforts to empirically validate such sequential models, except for one recent study, have been inconclusive. This paper takes a different approach to examining the relationships among competitive capabilities. The existing cross‐sectional studies of manufacturing capabilities are integrated to synthesize a proposed model of: (1) the relationships among manufacturing capabilities, and (2) the relationships between those capabilities and business performance. The proposed model is synthesized using data from previous studies, other models and theoretical arguments. Meta‐analysis is used to identify aspects of the model that appear better supported by empirical research and those that require further study. The implications of this proposed model with regard to research, practice and future research in operations strategy are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hunter, J., & Schmidt, F. (2004) · doi:10.4135/9781412985031 · Cited by 3,023
Cited by
Peng, D. X., & Lai, F. (2012) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2012.06.002 · Cited by 1,532
Linking routines to operations capabilities: A new perspective
Peng, D. X., Schroeder, R. G., & Shah, R. (2008) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.11.001 · Cited by 612
Nair, A. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.11.005 · Cited by 593
Absorptive capacity: Enhancing the assimilation of time‐based manufacturing practices
Tu, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., Ragu‐Nathan, T. S., & Sharkey, T. W. (2006) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2005.05.004 · Cited by 331
Terjesen, S., Patel, P. C., & Covin, J. G. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.07.004 · Cited by 158
Metadata
- Authors
- White, G. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 315-331
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1982606489
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis model of manufacturing capabilities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(96)00096-4
- The paper
- White, G. P. (1996). A meta‐analysis model of manufacturing capabilities. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(96)00096-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.