The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry
Abstract
This paper draws on the results of interviews with five environmental managers in the furniture industry to develop a taxonomy of environmentally‐friendly (‘green’) best practices within the operations management value chain. This taxonomy is then extended to develop a group of propositions concerning the role of management in promoting environmentally‐friendly practices. The results suggest that in order to be successful, environmental management strategies must be integrated into all stages of the value chain, which includes all of the processes spanning product design, procurement, manufacturing and assembly, packaging, logistics, and distribution. While the potential for environmental performance improvement in all five of the companies is evident, all of them demonstrated ‘pockets’ of environmentally‐friendly practices (EFP) in different areas of their respective value chain functions. The propositions and results emerging from the analysis also suggests that reacting to regulations is no longer sufficient. World‐class EFP must anticipate and pre‐empt changing environmental regulations and customer expectations, and proactively prepare products, processes and infrastructure for these changes without sacrificing competitive advantage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Cited by
Balancing priorities: decision-making in sustainable supply chain management
Wu, Z., & Pagell, M. (2011) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2010.10.001 · Cited by 956
A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges
Tseng, M.-L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019) · Resources, Conservation and Recycling · doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009 · Cited by 820
Green purchasing practices of US firms
Min, H., & Galle, W. P. (2001) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/eum0000000005923 · Cited by 745
PAULRAJ, A. (2011) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03212.x · Cited by 712
Environmental proactivity and business performance: an empirical analysis
González-Benito, J., & González-Benito, Ó. (2005) · Omega · doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.002 · Cited by 678
Metadata
- Authors
- Handfield, R. B., Walton, S. V., Seegers, L. K., & Melnyk, S. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Operations Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-315
- ISSN
- 0272-6963 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-1317
- OpenAlex
- W1964472774
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0272-6963(97)00004-1
- The paper
- Handfield, R. B., Walton, S. V., Seegers, L. K., & Melnyk, S. A. (1997). ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry. Journal of Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6963(97)00004-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.