Searching for the attention deficit in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: The case of visuospatial orienting
Abstract
We review all 14 extant studies of covert visuospatial attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) (total N=248). Metaanalysis showed that intriguing but isolated findings of alerting or posterior disengage deficits were too small to reliably detect with the sample sizes typically employed. Posterior move and engage operations and the vigilance sustained attention process were normal in ADHD. For exogenous cues, effect sizes for group differences were homogeneously small across all repeated-measures conditions, as were calculations of cost, benefit, and validity effects. For endogenous cues, effect sizes were heterogeneous; however, calculations of cost, benefit, and validity effects were small and homogenous. The most parsimonious conclusion may be that ADHD is not characterized by significant visual orienting dysfunction, but questions remain about the extent of anterior lateralized effects in the combined subtype and about attentional functioning in the inattentive subtype.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ADHD is not characterized by deficient visual attention.
“ADHD is not characterized by deficient visual attention”
From Relationships between neuropsychological measures of executive function and behavioral measures of ADHD symptoms and comorbid behavior (2006) · cites this paper as Huang-Pollock & Nigg, 2003
One meta-analysis found little or no evidence for visuospatial attention deficits in ADHD, including functions typically attributed to the anterior or executive attention system.
“One meta-analysis of 14 studies found little or no evidence for any visuospatial attention deficits in ADHD, including those functions typically attributed to the anterior or executive attention system (Huang-Pollock & Nigg, 2003).”
From The influences of environmental enrichment, cognitive enhancement, and physical exercise on brain development: Can we alter the developmental trajectory of ADHD? (2011) · cites this paper as Huang-Pollock & Nigg, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 162
- Authors
- Huang-Pollock, C. L., & Nigg, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- ORCID
- Nigg, Joel T
- Venue
- Clinical Psychology Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 801-830
- ISSN
- 0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2052774893
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5f31mh012333-02)
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH59105, MH12333)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Keywords
- attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, visuospatial attention, covert orienting, alerting, disengagement, sustained attention, exogenous cues, endogenous cues, validity effect, inattentive subtype, combined subtype
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orientation, Spatial Behavior, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review