Implementing planetary protection requirements for sample return missions
Abstract
NASA is committed to exploring space while avoiding the biological contamination of other solar system bodies and protecting the Earth against potential harm from materials returned from space. NASA's planetary protection program evaluates missions (with external advice from the US National Research Council and others) and imposes particular constraints on individual missions to achieve these objectives. In 1997 the National Research Council's Space Studies Board published the report, Mars Sample Return: Issues and Recommendations, which reported advice to NASA on Mars sample return missions, complementing their 1992 report, The Biological Contamination of Mars Issues and Recommendations. Meanwhile, NASA has requested a new Space Studies Board study to address sample returns from bodies other than Mars. This study recognizes the variety of worlds that have been opened up to NASA and its partners by small, relatively inexpensive, missions of the Discovery class, as well as the reshaping of our ideas about life in the solar system that have been occasioned by the Galileo spacecraft's discovery that an ocean under the ice on Jupiter's moon Europa might, indeed, exist. This paper will report on NASA's planned implementation of planetary protection provisions based on these recent National Research Council recommendations, and will suggest measures for incorporation in the planetary protection policy of COSPAR.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures.
“The prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures (Rummel, 2000; Mancinelli, 2003; Debus, 2006; Horneck et al., 2007).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Rummel, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
“The prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures (Rummel, 2000; Mancinelli, 2003; Debus, 2006; Horneck et al., 2007).”
- Authors
- Rummel, J. D.
- Affiliations
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rummel, J.D.
- ORCID
- Rummel, J.D.
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1893-1899
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066837811
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- National Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
- Keywords
- planetary protection, sample return missions, biological contamination, Mars sample return, National Research Council recommendations, Europa, extraterrestrial life
- MeSH terms
- Containment of Biohazards, Extraterrestrial Environment, International Agencies, Societies, Scientific, Space Flight, Specimen Handling, United States, Planets, Mars, United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review