The DOI matches its Crossref record.
COSPAR's planetary protection policy: A consolidated draft
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The current COSPAR planetary protection guidelines group missions into five different categories according to the scientific interest and mission goals for the different targets in our solar system.
“The current COSPAR planetary protection guidelines group missions into five different categories (Table 9) according to the scientific interest and mission goals for the different targets in our solar system (Rummel et al., 2002; COSPAR, 2011).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Rummel et al., 2002
There is a general consensus among scientists regarding the standard for the level of contamination considered safe on spacecraft that leave Earth to land on other planetary bodies.
“There is a general consensus among scientists regarding the standard for the level of contamination considered safe on spacecraft that leave Earth to land on other planetary bodies (Rummel et al., 2002).”
From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Rummel et al., 2002
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- 1964, COSPAR Resolution 26.5, COSPAR Information Bulletin, 20, 25
- 1969, COSPAR Decision No. 16, COSPAR Information Bulletin, 50, 15
- 1976, COSPAR Decision No. 9/76, COSPAR Information Bulletin, 76, 14
- 1984, COSPAR Internal Decision No. 7/84, COSPAR Letter 84/692-5.12.-G. 18 July 1984
- 1994, COSPAR Decision No. 1/94, COSPAR Information Bulletin, 131, 30
- Devincenzi, 1983, A proposed new policy for planetary protection, Adv. Space Res., 3, 13, 10.1016/0273-1177(83)90167-9 · DOI
- Devincenzi, 1994, Refinement of planetary protection policy for Mars missions, Adv. Space Res., 18, 314
- United Nations, 1967, Treaty on principles governing the activities of states in the exploration and use of outer space, including the moon and other celestial bodies, U.N. Doc. A/RES/2222/(XXI)
- United Nations, 1967, TIAS No. 6347
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136
“There is a general consensus among scientists regarding the standard for the level of contamination considered safe on spacecraft that leave Earth to land on other planetary bodies (Rummel et al., 2002).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Rummel, J. D., Stabekis, P. D., Devincenzi, D. L., & Barengoltz, J. B.
- Affiliations
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
- Ames Research Center (US)
- Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US)
- ORCID
- Rummel, J.D.
- Venue
- Advances in Space Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1567-1571
- ISSN
- 0273-1177 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972502521
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Advances in Space Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
- Keywords
- planetary protection, COSPAR, planetary protection policy, space exploration, contamination control, policy consolidation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
