Cited by 33

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Partial oxidation effects during the combined oxidative and biological treatment of separated streams of tannery wastewater

·1997·Water Science and Technology

Abstract

The ozonation of biologically pre-treated tannery wastewater and the influence of the applied specific ozone consumption onto a subsequent biological treatment were investigated. Combining sum parameters, such as COD, DOC and UV-absorbance, it could be differentiated between mineralization and partial oxidation effects. In the case of UV-removal the newly developed partial oxidation parameters correlate with the subsequent biological removal. It could be shown that partial oxidation of COD is favourable for subsequent biodegradation, whereas further mineralization reduces the effectivity of biological oxidation. The optimal range of subsequent biological treatment was observed at a specific ozone consumption of 1 to 3 g O3/g DOC0. As far as the distribution of molecular weight fractions is concerned, the ozonation leads to a relative increase of the low molecular weight DOC-fraction (< 1,000 u), which includes the majority of the residual UV-absorbance at 254 nm. Acute toxicity, measured as luminescence inhibition of Vibrio fischeri, is affected by ozonation as well. The calculated 1/EC20 data decrease with increasing specific ozone consumption.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0273-1223(97)00043-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 33

Metadata

Venue
Water Science and Technology
Published
1997
Volume
35
Issue
4
ISSN
0273-1223
Cited by
33
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review