Cited by 351Stress Responses and CortisolHealth disparities and outcomesEmployment and Welfare Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 149 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychobiological mechanisms of socioeconomic differences in health

Kristenson, M, Eriksen, H.R, Sluiter, J.K, Starke, D, Ursin, H·2004·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The association between low socioeconomic status and poor health is well established. Empirical studies suggest that psychosocial factors are important mediators for these effects, and that the effects are mediated by psychobiological mechanisms related to stress physiology. The objective of this paper is to explore these psychobiological mechanisms. Psychobiological responses to environmental challenges depend on acquired expectancies (learning) of the relations between responses and stimuli. The stress response occurs whenever an individual is faced with a challenge. It is an essential element in the total adaptive system of the body, and necessary for adaptation, performance and survival. However, a period of recovery is necessary to rebalance and to manage new demands. Individuals with low social status report more environmental challenges and less psychosocial resources. This may lead to vicious circles of learning to expect negative outcomes, loss of coping ability, strain, hopelessness and chronic stress. This type of learning may interfere with the recovery processes, leading to sustained psychobiological activation and loss of dynamic capacity to respond to new challenges. Psychobiological responses and health effects in humans and animals depend on combinations of demands and expected outcomes (coping, control). In studies of humans with chronic psychosocial stress, and low SES, cortisol baseline levels were raised, and the cortisol response to acute stress attenuated. Low job control was associated with insufficient recovery of catecholamines and cortisol, and a range of negative health effects. Biological effects of choice of lifestyle, which also depends on the acquired outcome expectancies, reinforce these direct psychobiological effects on health. The paper concludes that sustained activation and loss of capacity to respond to a novel stressor could be a cause of the higher risk of illness and disease found among people with lower SES.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00353-8

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 149 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Antonovsky, 1984, A call for a new question—salutogenesis—and a proposed answer—the sense of coherence, Journal of Preventive Psychiatry, 2, 1
  2. Helmers, 1995, Defensive hostility, Health Psychology, 14, 202, 10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.202 · DOI
  3. Kristenson, M. (1998). Possible causes for the differences in coronary heart disease between Lithuania and Sweden, Thesis, Linköping.
  4. Marmot, 2001, Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health, British Medical Journal, 19, 322
  5. Rosmond, R., Holm, G., & Björntorp, P. (1999). Food induced cortisol secretion in men: relationships with abdominal obesity, hormones, metabolism and circulation. International Journal of Obesity Related Metabolic Disorder.
  6. Siegrist, 1997, Linking sociological with physiological data, Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 161, 112
  7. Ursin, H. (1988). Expectancy and activation: an attempt to systematise stress theory. In: D. Hellheimer, L. Florin, H. Weiner (Eds.), Neurobiological approaches to human disease (pp. 313–334).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 350

Metadata

Authors
Kristenson, M., Eriksen, H. R., Sluiter, J. K., Starke, D., & Ursin, H.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Bergen (NO)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Kristenson, M
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-04
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
1511-1522
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2074544938
Cited by
351
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 20
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Employment and Welfare Studies
Keywords
socioeconomic status, health disparities, psychosocial stress, stress physiology, cortisol, job control, coping, outcome expectations, chronic stress, catecholamines, lifestyle choices, psychobiological mechanisms, social status and health
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Life Style, Social Class, Socioeconomic Factors, Stress, Psychological, Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review