The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A ship upon a stormy sea: The medicalization of pregnancy
Abstract
This is an empirical illustration of the role of biomedical rhetoric in the rise of medicine's cultural authority. Using the case of pregnancy in the United States I delineate how biomedical rhetoric was key in the historical process of medicalization. The first systematic attempt to introduce women to a medical interpretation of pregnancy was the public health campaign of the United States Children's Bureau in the early twentieth century. A cornerstone of the Children's Bureau campaign was its publication "Prenatal Care," first published in 1913 and distributed to well over twenty-two million women by the mid-thirties. Prenatal Care represents the biomedical interpretation of pregnancy as it was first introduced to women. Through an analysis of this document I demonstrate the discursive mechanisms through which biomedicine reconceptualized pregnancy as medically problematic rather than as experientially and organically demanding. Prenatal Care demonstrates the ways in which the "universal" claims of biomedicine can advance a particular class and racial/ethnic composite of woman.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Over the years, sociologists have shown that women's natural reproductive functions (e.g., pregnancy, childbirth, menstruation) are routinely medicalized (Barker 1998; Riessman 1983; Riska 2003).”
From The Social Construction of Illness: Key Insights and Policy Implications (2010) · cites this paper as Barker 1998
Citations
Cites
Oudshoorn, N. (2003) · doi:10.4324/9780203421529 · Cited by 275
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Alexander, 1995, The role of prenatal care in preventing low birth weight, The Future of Children, 5, 103, 10.2307/1602510 · DOI
- Barker, K. (1993) Birthing and Bureaucratic Women: Gender, Professionalization and the Construction of Medical Needs, 1920–1935. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Brown, P. (1995) Naming and framing: The social construction of diagnosis and illness. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, pp. 34–52 · DOI
- Conrad, P. and Schneider, J. W. (1992) Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA
- Dubos (1968) · DOI
- Ehrenreich, B. and English, D. (1973) Witches, Midwives, and Nurses: A History of Women Healers. Feminist Press, Old Westbury, NY · DOI
- Eyer, D. E. (1992) Mother–Infant Bonding: A Scientific Fiction. Yale University Press, New Haven and London
- Foucault, M. (1980) The History of Sexuality. Vintage Books, New York · DOI
- Good, B. (1994) Medicine, Rationality, and Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge · DOI
- Huntington, 1994, Sounding board: For every dollar spent – the cost–savings argument for prenatal care, The New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 1303, 10.1056/NEJM199411103311910 · DOI
- Illich, I. (1976) Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. Bantam Books, New York · DOI
- Irvine, J. M. (ed.) (1994) Sexual Cultures and the Construction of Adolescent Identities. Temple University Press, Philadelphia
- Kessler-Harris, A. (1990) A Woman's Wage: Historical Meanings and Social Consequences. University Press of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
- Kessler-Harris, A. (1982) Out to Work: A History of Wage Earning Women in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York
- Ladd-Taylor, M. (1986) Raising A Baby The Government Way. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick and London
- Lantz, P. and M. Partin (1995) Prenatal and Infant Health Indicators. Institute for Research On Poverty Special Report Series, Indicators of Children's Well-Being, Conference Papers, Vol. II, Child Health, Education, and Economic Security, May, pp. 3–32
- Leavitt, J. W. (1986) Brought To Bed: Childbearing in America, 1750–1950. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford
- Martin, E. (1987) The Woman in the Body: A Cultural Analysis of Reproduction. Beacon Press, Boston
- Muncy, R. (1991) Creating A Female Dominion in American Reform, 1890–1935. Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford · DOI
- Reiser, S. (1978) Medicine and the Reign of Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
- Rodin, 1992, The social construction of premenstrual syndrome, Social Science and Medicine, 35, 49, 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90118-A · DOI
- Taussig, 1937, The story of prenatal care, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 34, 731, 10.1016/S0002-9378(37)90723-3 · DOI
- Tesh, S. N. (1988) Hidden Arguments: Political Ideology and Disease Prevention Policy. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick, NJ
- Warner, J. H. (1986) The Therapeutic Perspective: Medical Practice, Knowledge and Identity in America, 1820–1885. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
- Wertz, D. and R. Wertz (1977) Lying-In: A History of Childbirth in America. Free Press, New York
- Zola, 1972, Medicine as an institution of social control, Sociological Review, 20, 487, 10.1111/j.1467-954X.1972.tb00220.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–118 of 118
Exploring Well-Being at Three Great Lakes Lighthouses
Surface-Evans, S. L. (2022) · International Journal of Historical Archaeology · doi:10.1007/s10761-021-00643-2 · Cited by 1
“1 3 childbirth, and childrearing at the time (Barker 1998).”
BackgroundMedykalizacja starości na podstawie wybranych przykładów filmowych
Galuszka, A. I., & Probierz, E. (2020) · doi:10.18778/2450-4491.10.06
“Z dostępnych badań można zauważyć postępującą medykalizację innych obszarów życia, m.in. seksualności (Tiefer 1996: 252–282), porodów (Cahill 2001: 334–342), samej ciąży (Barker 1998: 1067–1076) czy menopauzy (Kaufert, Gilbert 1986: 7–21).”
Introduction: Reproduction through the Lens of Medical Sociology
Markens, S., Armstrong, E., & Waggoner, M. (2019) · doi:10.1108/s1057-629020190000020006
Waggoner, M. (2016) · doi:10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss503
A Brief Overview of How Male Medicine Co-opted the Birth Process
Vernon, L. F. (2015) · doi:10.19104/whi.2015.108
A Piece of Nigromante in Boyle Heights
Barajas, J. E. (2013) · doi:10.5642/lux.201303.04
“Faith is a critical factor when individuals seek different medical systems; the effectiveness of folk practices hinges on the faith of the individual.”
BackgroundMasella, M.-A., & Godard, B. (2025) · Canadian Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.7202/1117866ar
Behavioural Expectations and Behaviour Change in Pregnancy: Experiences of Young Single Women
Reszel, J. (2013) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-6408
“The current conceptualization of pregnancy as a period with inherent risk (Barker, 1998) has necessitated not only specific actions and behaviours to mitigate such risks, but also societal and personal surveillance to enforce “appropriate” behaviours.”
BackgroundInfluentialJewish Bioethics: The Human Body
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.005
Terminal Care and the Ends of Life
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.010
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.007
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.011
Jewish Bioethics: Fertility and Very Early Prenatal Life
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.006
Organ Transplantation and the Brain Death Debate
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.009
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.008
Jewish Bioethics: Doctor–Patient Relationship
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.004
Barilan, Y. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139175890.003
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, K. K.
- Affiliations
- Linfield College (US)
- Corresponding author
- Barker, K.K
- ORCID
- Barker, K.K
- Venue
- Social Science & Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1067-1076
- ISSN
- 0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974600314
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 54.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Keywords
- medicalization of pregnancy, Children's Bureau, prenatal care, public health campaigns, medical authority, discursive mechanisms, women's health, history of medicine, early 20th century
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Medicine, Philosophy, Medical, Physicians, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, United States
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review