CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 292Community Health and DevelopmentEvaluation and Performance AssessmentParticipatory Visual Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Power between evaluator and community: research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities

Wallerstein, Nina·1999·Social Science & Medicine
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00073-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The relationship between evaluators and communities has been changing in the last two decades to a model of research 'with' the community, instead of research 'on' the community. This shift has paralleled increasing community demands for accountability and authority as community participation rhetoric has given way to words such as partnership, collaboration and community empowerment. Despite the rhetoric, there has been little reflection on the problematic and contradictory relationships between communities and researchers, specifically as related to their differing positions of power. This article provides a reflective examination of the contested power dynamics of the research relationship within a participatory evaluation process of the Healthier Communities initiative in New Mexico. An in-depth literature review of the philosophical principles and the complex realities of evaluations based on participatory, community-driven and post-modern inquiry precedes the case study. Without ongoing consideration of power issues, the article argues that evaluation design, implementation and utilization of findings will be compromised.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00073-8

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 128 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Farquhar, 1990, Effects of community-wide education and cardiovascular disease risk factors: The Standard Five City Project, Journal of American Medical Association, 264, 359, 10.1001/jama.264.3.359 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Goodman, R.M., Wandersman, A., 1994. Forecast: a formative approach to evaluating community coalitions and community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Psychology, Monograph Series: CSAP Special Issue, Community Partnership Program, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention, Kaftarian, S.J., Hansen, W.B. (Eds). 6–25.
  3. 1997, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 13
  4. Kaftarian, S.J., Hansen, W.B., (Eds) 1994. Monograph series, CSAP special issue: community partnership program, Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Journal of Community Psychology.
  5. 1996, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12
  6. Perkins, 1990, You'll have to work to overcome our suspicions: the benefits and pitfalls of research with community organizations, Social Policy, 21, 32
  7. Springer, J.F., Phillips, J.L., 1994. Policy learning and evaluation design: lessons from the community partnership demonstration program. In: Kaftarian and Hansen (Eds) 1994. Journal of Community Psychology, 117–139.
  8. Springett, 1995, Towards a framework for evaluation in health promotion: methodology, principles and practice, The Journal of Contemporary Health, 2, 61

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–292 of 292

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wallerstein, N.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Wallerstein, Nina
ORCID
Wallerstein, Nina
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
39-53
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00073-8
OpenAlex
W2056683821
Cited by
292
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
12.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Community Health and Development
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
power relations, participatory evaluation, community empowerment, community participation, New Mexico, community-led research, evaluation design, accountability
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Health Services Research, Humans, New Mexico, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Power, Psychological, Community Health Planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review