Neuropsychological performance and regional cerebral blood flow in obsessive–compulsive disorder
Abstract
Convergent findings from neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies have suggested that neural dysfunction in frontal-subcortical circuits may play a central role in the pathophysiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). To further examine the relationship between these two sets of findings we investigated both neuropsychological functions and regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) in a combined study. Fourteen unmedicated patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for OCD and 14 healthy controls matched for age, gender, handedness, and education were assessed on neuropsychological tests that included Trail Making Test (TMT), Rey Complex Figure Test (RCF) (copy and 5-min recall), Verbal Fluency Test (VFT), and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). rCBF was studied with 99 mTc-hexamethyl-propyleneamine-oxime (HMPAO) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Patients performed more poorly than controls (P<.05) on RCF (copy), VFT, and WCST (perseverative errors). Spearman's correlations indicated that severity of OCD correlated inversely with performance on the RCF (copy and recall scores) and positively with rCBF in the right thalamus. Positive correlations were observed between nonperseverative errors (WCST) and rCBF in frontal areas and anterior cingulate. Perseverative errors (WCST) correlated negatively with rCBF in the right thalamus. These findings are consistent with most previously published studies and suggest neural dysfunctions in the frontal-subcortical circuits probably more pronounced in the right hemisphere. They also extend the existing research, showing associations between deficits in cortical-subcortical circuitry and performance on neuropsychological tests of controlled attention and visuospatial functions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies examining behavioral deficits in reversal learning in OCD patients yielded mixed outcomes.
“Previous studies examining behavioral deficits in reversal learning in OCD patients yielded mixed outcomes, with some studies observing deficits,21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 whereas others did not.28, 29, 30”
From Behavioral flexibility in a mouse model for obsessive‐compulsive disorder: Impaired Pavlovian reversal learning in SAPAP3 mutants (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
Previous studies examining symptom-unrelated cognitive flexibility in OCD patients yielded mixed outcomes, with some studies observing behavioral deficits in reversal learning, whereas others did not.
“However, previous studies examining symptom‐unrelated cognitive flexibility in OCD patients yielded mixed outcomes, with some studies observing behavioral deficits in reversal learning,21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 whereas others did not.28, 29, 30, 69”
From Behavioral flexibility in a mouse model for obsessive‐compulsive disorder: Impaired Pavlovian reversal learning in SAPAP3 mutants (2019) · cites this paper as [23]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 89 · Cited by 98
- Authors
- Lacerda, A. L. T., Dalgalarrondo, P., Caetano, D., Haas, G. L., Camargo, E. E., & Keshavan, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Lacerda, Acioly L.T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 657-665
- ISSN
- 0278-5846 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996617660
- Cited by
- 98
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Yale University
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, regional cerebral blood flow, frontal-subcortical circuits, perseverative errors, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Rey Complex Figure Test, verbal fluency, attentional control, visuospatial ability, thalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, right hemisphere, HMPAO SPECT, neuropsychological performance
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attention, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Regional Blood Flow, Severity of Illness Index, Thalamus, Visual Perception, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review