Cited by 149Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEstrogen and related hormone effects

Environmental polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons affect androgen receptor activation in vitro

Vinggaard, Anne Marie, Hnida, Christina, Larsen, John Christian·2000·Toxicology

Abstract

Nine structurally different polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were tested for their ability to either agonize or antagonize the human androgen receptor (hAR) in a sensitive reporter gene assay based on CHO cells transiently cotransfected with a hAR vector and an MMTV-LUC vector. Benz[a]anthracene (B[a]A), benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), fluoranthene, chrysene and 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) were acting as antiandrogens in vitro, resulting in IC(50) values of 3.2, 3.9, 4.6, 10.3 and 10.4 microM, respectively. Only at the highest concentration tested (10 microM), a slight inhibitory effect by pyrene, phenanthrene, and anthracene was observed. In contrast, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene (DB[a,h]A) gave rise to an agonistic effect, which was added upon the effect of the androgen receptor agonist R1881 (0.1 nM). The antiandrogenic responses by PAHs (10 microM) were found to be fully reversible, determined in the presence of increasing concentrations of R1881. No cytotoxic effects of the tested compounds were observed as determined either by metabolic reduction using AlamarBlue (up to 20 microM) or determined in cells transfected with a constitutively active hAR (up to 10 microM). The well-known ability of certain PAHs to activate the Ah receptor was assessed in H4IIE liver cancer cells, stably transfected with a luciferase reporter gene system. The positive control 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin (TCDD) caused a 13-14-fold induction of luciferase activity reaching maximum activit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0300-483x(00)00143-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinggaard, A. M., Hnida, C., & Larsen, J. C.
Affiliations
Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (DK)
Corresponding author
Vinggaard, Anne Marie
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
145
Issue
2-3
Pages
173-183
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985066503
Cited by
149
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Technical University of Denmark, DTU Orbit (Technical University of Denmark, DTU) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, androgen receptor, antiandrogenic activity, benzo[a]pyrene, benz[a]anthracene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene, chrysene, fluoranthene, pyrene, phenanthrene, anthracene, 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, R1881, H4IIE cells, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin, environmental pollutants, endocrine disruption, gene expression regulation, cytotoxicity, Alamar Blue assay, luciferase
MeSH terms
Animals, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Environmental Pollutants, Cricetinae, Humans, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Receptors, Androgen, CHO Cells, Receptors, Aryl Hydrocarbon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review