Cited by 336Immunotoxicology and immune responsesAnimal testing and alternativesImmune Response and Inflammation

Species differences in the structure and function of the immune system

Haley, Patrick J.·2003·Toxicology

Abstract

With the recent publication of regulatory guidelines from both the FDA and the CPMP addressing the investigation of immunotoxicity of new chemical entities has come the requisite increased application of immunotoxicology protocols. Importantly, the fulfillment of these protocols may require the use of different species, and while in many cases information concerning the structure and function of the immune system can be readily translated across species, there are numerous and significant species differences that need to be considered. In some cases, the generation of meaningful immunotoxicology data can be adversely affected by the choice of a species that does not adequately share the immune function of concern with man. Likewise immunotoxicology testing in one species may produce negative data in one species but positive data in another. Knowing the mechanistic basis through an understanding of species differences in the structure and function of the immune system is pivotal to success. This becomes especially true as pharmaceutical companies design and develop highly specific immunomodulatory molecules that demonstrate species-specific pharmacology. This review is an exploration of various species differences in the structure and function of the immune system and an attempt to identify those differences that may be important in the conduct of immunotoxicity tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0300-483x(03)00043-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inconsistencies in the literature may stem from the use of cell lines or murine primary cells, which do not fully represent primary human monocyte-derived macrophages.

    “These inconsistencies may stem from the use of cell lines or murine primary cells, which do not fully represent the behaviour of primary human monocyte-derived macrophages.”
  • Most works on stiffness and macrophages have predominantly relied on cell lines or murine primary cells, with limited investigation using primary human monocyte-derived macrophages.

    “Additionally, most works have predominantly relied on cell lines or murine primary cells, with limited investigation using primary human monocyte-derived macrophages.”
  • The general structure of the immune system in mice and humans is very similar, though discrepancies in both the innate and adaptive immune system exist.

    “The general structure of the immune system in mice and humans is also very similar, though discrepancies in both the innate and adaptive immune system exist”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 174 · Cited by 336

Authors
Haley, P. J.
Affiliations
AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Haley, Patrick J.
Venue
Toxicology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-06
Volume
188
Issue
1
Pages
49-71
ISSN
0300-483X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026529532
Cited by
336
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune Response and Inflammation
Keywords
species differences, immunotoxicity testing, interspecies extrapolation, immunomodulators, new chemical entities
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Laboratory, Immunotoxins, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Immune System, Species Specificity, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Risk Assessment, Toxicity Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review