The identification of risk factors for cardiac arrest and formulation of activation criteria to alert a medical emergency team
Abstract
Aim (1) To identify risk factors for in-hospital cardiac arrest; (2) to formulate activation criteria to alert a clinical response culminating in attendance by a Medical Emergency Team (MET); (3) to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the scoring system.Methods Quasi-experimental design to determine prevalence of risk factors for cardiac arrest in the hospitalised population. Weighting of risk factors and formulation of activation criteria to alert a graded clinical response. ROC analysis of weighted cumulative scores to determine their sensitivity and specificity.Setting An acute 700 bed district general hospital with 32,348 adult admissions in 1999 and a catchment population of around 365,000.Subjects 118 consecutive adult patients suffering primary cardiac arrest in-hospital and 132 non-arrest patients, randomly selected according to stratified randomisation by gender and age.Results Risk factors for cardiac arrest include: abnormal respiratory rate (P = 0.013), abnormal breathing indicator (abnormal rate or documented shortness of breath) (P < 0.001), abnormal pulse (P < 0.001), reduced systolic blood pressure (P < 0.001), abnormal temperature (P < 0.001), reduced pulse oximetry (P < 0.001), chest pain (P < 0.001) and nurse or doctor concern (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of cardiac arrest cases identified three positive associations for cardiac arrest: abnormal breathing indicator (OR 3.49; 95% CI: 1.69-7.21), abnormal pulse (OR 4.07; 95% CI: 2.0-8.31) and abnormal systolic blood pressure (OR 19.92; 95% CI: 9.48-41.84). Risk factors were weighted and tabulated. The aggregate score determines the grade of clinical response. ROC analysis determined that a score of 4 has 89% sensitivity and 77% specificity for cardiac arrest; a score of 8 has 52% sensitivity and 99% specificity. All patients scoring greater than 10 suffered cardiac arrest.Conclusion Risk factors for cardiac arrest have been identified, quantified and formulated into a table of activation criteria to help predict and avert cardiac arrest by alerting a clinical response. A graded clinical response has resulted in a tool that has both sensitivity and specificity for cardiac arrest.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
High basal respiratory rates predict negative cardiopulmonary outcomes.
“High basal respiratory rates also predict negative cardiopulmonary outcomes (Fieselmann et al., 1993; Hodgetts et al., 2002).”
From Hypothesis: Pulmonary Afferent Activity Patterns During Slow, Deep Breathing Contribute to the Neural Induction of Physiological Relaxation (2019) · cites this paper as Hodgetts et al., 2002
There are no reliable national data to enable accurate determination of the incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the UK.
“Despite this, there are no reliable national data to enable accurate determination of the incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the UK.”
From Incidence and outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom National Cardiac Arrest Audit (2014) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 355
- Authors
- Hodgetts, T. J., Kenward, G., Vlachonikolis, I. G., Payne, S., & Castle, N.
- Affiliations
- Selly Oak Hospital (GB)
- Frimley Park Hospital (GB)
- University of Surrey (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hodgetts, Timothy J.
- ORCID
- Hodgetts, Timothy J.
- Venue
- Resuscitation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-131
- ISSN
- 0300-9572 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117583933
- Cited by
- 355
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 21
- FWCI
- 8.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Resuscitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Keywords
- risk factors, medical emergency team, activation criteria, cardiac arrest prediction, abnormal breathing, pulse oximetry, chest pain, sensitivity and specificity, risk scoring, hospitalized patients, cardiac arrest prevention, nurses' concerns, dyspnea, temperature anomalies
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Emergencies, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Treatment, Female, Heart Arrest, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review