Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study

Petrou, Stavros, Kupek, Emil, Vause, Sarah, Maresh, Michael·2003·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
DOI 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Villar, 1997, Scientific basis for the content of routine antenatal care. I. Philosophy, recent studies, and power to eliminate or alleviate adverse maternal outcomes, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 76, 1, 10.3109/00016349709047778 · DOI
  2. Oakley, 1982, The relevance of the history of medicine to an understanding of current change, some comments from the domain of antenatal care, Soc. Sci. Med., 16, 667, 10.1016/0277-9536(82)90456-7 · DOI
  3. Khan-Neelofur, 1998, Who should provide routine antenatal care for low-risk women, and how often? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (for the WHO Antenatal Care Trial Research Group), Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol., 12, 7, 10.1046/j.1365-3016.12.s2.6.x · DOI
  4. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. National evidence-based clinical guideline: antenatal care for the healthy woman. London: Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, in press.
  5. Villar J, Khan-Neelofur D. Patterns of routine antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy (Cochrane review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Oxford: Update Software, 2001. · DOI
  6. Binstock, 1995, Alternative prenatal care-impact of reduced visit frequency, focused visits and continuity of care, J. Reprod. Med., 40, 507
  7. McDuffie, 1996, Effect of frequency of prenatal care visits on perinatal outcome among low-risk women: a randomized controlled trial, JAMA, 275, 847, 10.1001/jama.1996.03530350029030 · DOI
  8. Munjanja, 1996, Randomised controlled trial of a reduced programme of antenatal care in Harare, Zimbabwe, Lancet, 348, 364, 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)01250-0 · DOI
  9. Sikorski, 1996, A randomised controlled trial comparing two schedules of antenatal visits: the antenatal care project, BMJ, 312, 546, 10.1136/bmj.312.7030.546 · DOI
  10. Majoko, 1997, A study of two antenatal care models in a rural setting in Zimbabwe, Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand., 76, 87
  11. Walker, 1997, Evaluation of a reduced frequency prenatal visit schedule for low-risk women at a free-standing birthing centre, J. Nurs. Mid., 42, 295, 10.1016/S0091-2182(97)00027-X · DOI
  12. Villar, 2001, WHO antenatal care randomised trial for the evaluation of a new model of routine antenatal care, Lancet, 357, 1551, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04722-X · DOI · Paper page
  13. Gortmaker, 1979, The effect of prenatal care upon the health of the newborn, Am. J. Publ. Health, 69, 653, 10.2105/AJPH.69.7.653 · DOI
  14. Ryan, 1980, Prenatal care and pregnancy outcome, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 137, 876, 10.1016/S0002-9378(16)32826-5 · DOI
  15. Greenberg, 1983, The impact of prenatal care in different social group, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 145, 797, 10.1016/0002-9378(83)90681-6 · DOI
  16. Leveno, 1985, Prenatal care and low birth weight infant, Obstet. Gynecol., 66, 599
  17. Blondel, 1998, Poor antenatal care in 20 French districts: risk factors and pregnancy outcome, J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health, 52, 501, 10.1136/jech.52.8.501 · DOI
  18. Kramer MS. Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics: a primer for clinical investigators and decision-makers. Berlin: Spinger, 1988. · DOI
  19. Vause, 1999, Indicators of quality of antenatal care: a pilot study, BJOG, 106, 197, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1999.tb08231.x · DOI
  20. Petrou, 2001, Clinical, provider and sociodemographic determinants of the number of antenatal visits in England and Wales, Soc. Sci. Med., 52, 1123, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00212-4 · DOI
  21. Klein, 1983, A comparison of low-risk pregnant women booked for delivery in two systems of care: shared-care (consultant), BJOG, 90, 118, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1983.tb08894.x · DOI
  22. Reynolds, 1988, General practitioner obstetrics: does risk prediction work?, J. R. Coll. Gen. Pract., 38, 307
  23. Bryce, 1990, General practitioner obstetrics in Bradford, BMJ, 300, 725, 10.1136/bmj.300.6726.725 · DOI
  24. Street, 1991, Community obstetric care in West Berkshire, BMJ, 302, 698, 10.1136/bmj.302.6778.698 · DOI
  25. MacVicar, 1993, Simulated home delivery in hospital: a randomised controlled trial, BJOG, 100, 316, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb12972.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Tucker, 1994, Is antenatal care apportioned according to obstetric-risk? The Scottish antenatal care study, J. Publ. Health Med., 16, 60, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a042937 · DOI
  27. Macfarlane, A., Mugford, M., Birth counts: statistics of pregnancy and childbirth, 2nd Edition. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
  28. Blondel, 1985, Some characteristics of care in 13 European countries, BJOG, 92, 565, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1985.tb01393.x · DOI
  29. Sen, 1991, Are three antenatal visits enough for low-risk mothers?, Sing J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 22, 83
  30. Haas, 1996, Prenatal hospitalization and compliance with the guidelines for prenatal care, Am. J. Publ. Health, 86, 815, 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.815 · DOI
  31. Kogan, 1994, Relationship of the content of prenatal care to the risk of low birth weight: maternal reports of health behavior advice and initial prenatal care procedures, JAMA, 271, 1340, 10.1001/jama.1994.03510410052032 · DOI
  32. Heins, 1990, A randomized trial of nurse-midwifery prenatal care to reduce low birth weight, Obstet. Gynecol., 75, 341
  33. Olds, 1986, Improving the delivery of prenatal care and outcomes of pregnancy: a randomized trial of nurse home visitation, Pediatrics, 77, 16, 10.1542/peds.77.1.16 · DOI
  34. McLaughlin, 1992, Randomized trial of comprehensive prenatal care for low-income women: effect on infant birth weight, Pediatrics, 89, 128, 10.1542/peds.89.1.128 · DOI

Cited by

See all 44

Metadata

Authors
Petrou, S., Kupek, E., Vause, S., & Maresh, M.
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-01
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
40-49
ISSN
0301-2115
DOI
10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4
Cited by
44
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4
The paper
Petrou, S., Kupek, E., Vause, S., & Maresh, M. (2003). Antenatal visits and adverse perinatal outcomes: results from a British population-based study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-2115(02)00215-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.