The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Win–win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship
Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. V. D. (1995) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.9.4.97 · Cited by 13,365
Porter, M. E. (1991) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168 · Cited by 1,540
Cited by
Trumpp, C., & Guenther, T. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1900 · Cited by 543
On modeling pollution-generating technologies
Murty, S., Robert Russell, R., & Levkoff, S. B. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2012.02.005 · Cited by 538
Peng, H., Shen, N., Ying, H., & Wang, Q. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128044 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Murty, M. N., & Kumar, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-144
- ISSN
- 0301-4797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054724276
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Win–win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00203-7
- The paper
- Murty, M. N., & Kumar, S. (2003). Win–win opportunities and environmental regulation: testing of porter hypothesis for Indian manufacturing industries. Journal of Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4797(02)00203-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
