The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective
Open accessAbstract
This selective review of the biological effects of ultrasound presents a synopsis of our current understanding of how cells insonated in vitro are affected by inertial cavitation from the standpoint of physical and chemical mechanisms. The focus of this review is on the physical and chemical mechanisms of action of inertial cavitation which appear to be effective in causing biological effects. There are several fundamental conditions which must be satisfied before cavitation-related bioeffects may arise. First, bubbles must be created and then brought into proximity to cells. Exposure methods are critical in this regard, and simple procedures such as rotation of a vessel containing the cells during exposure can drastically alter the results. Second, once association is achieved between bubbles and cells, the former must interact with the latter to produce a bioeffect. It is not certain that the inertial event is the prime mechanism by which cells are lysed; there is evidence that the turbulence associated with bubble translation may cause lysis. Additionally, there appear to be chemical and other physical mechanisms by which inertial cavitation may affect cells; these include the generation of biologically effective sonochemicals and the apparent emission of ultraviolet (UV) and soft X-rays. The evidence for inertial cavitation occurring within cells is critically reviewed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Physics of bubble oscillations
Lauterborn, W., & Kurz, T. (2010) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/73/10/106501 · Cited by 816
Intracellular Delivery by Membrane Disruption: Mechanisms, Strategies, and Concepts
Stewart, M. P., Langer, R., & Jensen, K. F. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00678 · Cited by 747
Methods of downstream processing for the production of biodiesel from microalgae
Kim, J., Yoo, G., Lee, H., Lim, J., Kim, K., Kim, C. W., Park, M. S., & Yang, J.-W. (2013) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.04.006 · Cited by 519
Sonoporation from Jetting Cavitation Bubbles
Ohl, C.-D., Arora, M., Ikink, R., de Jong, N., Versluis, M., Delius, M., & Lohse, D. (2006) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1529/biophysj.105.075366 · Cited by 498
Coussios, >. C., Farny, C. H., Ter Haar, G., & Roy, R. A. (2007) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.1080/02656730701194131 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, M. W., Miller, D. L., & Brayman, A. A.
- Venue
- Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1131-1154
- ISSN
- 0301-5629 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1981953976
- Cited by
- 528
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00089-0
- The paper
- Miller, M. W., Miller, D. L., & Brayman, A. A. (1996). A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-5629(96)00089-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.