Models of aquatic plant productivity: a review of the factors that influence growth
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Abiotic conditions, such as current and wind velocities, may further differentiate ecosystem properties of floating meadows in forested and nonforested areas.
“Abiotic conditions, such as current and wind velocities, may further differentiate ecosystem properties of floating meadows in forested and nonforested areas (Carr et al., 1997; Thomaz et al., 2003).”
From Threshold responses of floating meadow fish communities to floodplain forest cover in the lower Amazon River (2025) · cites this paper as Carr et al., 1997
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Grinstead, S., Arantes, C. C., Winemiller, K. O., Kelso‐Winemiller, L. C., de Oliveira, J. A., Petrere, M., & Freitas, C. E. C. (2025) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70110
- Authors
- Carr, G. M., Duthie, H. C., & Taylor, W. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Duthie, Hamish C.
- ORCID
- Taylor, William D.
- Venue
- Aquatic Botany
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 195-215
- ISSN
- 0304-3770 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996210551
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aquatic Botany (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
- Keywords
- rooted macrophytes, seaweed, growth models, photosynthesis, respiration, washout, plant decay, light availability, water temperature, water velocity, phosphorus, nitrogen, dissolved inorganic carbon, model calibration and verification, freshwater ecosystems, water quality management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review