CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 119Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactIndoor Air Quality and Microbial ExposureAir Quality and Health Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and total suspended particulate in indoor and outdoor atmosphere of a Taiwanese temple

Lin, Ta-Chang, Chang, Feng-Hsiang, Hsieh, Jue-Hsien, Chao, How-Ran, Chao, Mu-Rong·2002·Journal of Hazardous Materials
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00146-2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Incense burning, a common and popular practice among many families and in most temples in Taiwan, can result in indoor pollution-related health problems. This exploratory study was aimed at characterizing human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and total suspended particulate (TSP) inside and around a Taiwanese temple, and to compare the indoor levels with levels outside. Additionally, three types of commonly used unburned incense and incense ash were analyzed in order to evaluate the relationship between incense composition and PAH emissions.Standard methods were used to determine air concentrations of 21 PAHs and TSP inside and around a chosen temple. Indoor mean total-PAH concentration, particle-bound PAH concentration and TSP concentration were 6258 ng/m(3), 490 micro g/g and 1316 micro g/m(3), respectively; values for outdoor readings were 231 ng/m (3), 245 micro g/g and 73 micro g/m(3), for outdoors, respectively indicating PAH and TSP concentrations inside 27 and 18 times greater, respectively than outdoors. With respect to concentrations of individual PAHs (particulate+gas phase), the five highest concentrations were of acenaphthylene (AcPy) (3583 ng/m(3)), naphthalene (Nap) (1264 ng/m(3)), acenaphthene (Acp) (349 ng/m(3)), fluoranthene (FL) (243 ng/m(3)) and phenanthrene (PA) (181 ng/m(3)). Median values for indoor/outdoor (I/O) ratios of individual PAHs ranged from 5.7 to 387.9, which implied that the temple was a significant PAH source. Moreover, PAH content of the tested stick incense and ash was very low. PAH levels inside the temple were much higher than those measured in the vicinity and inside residential houses; and were in fact close to levels measured at a local traffic intersection in Tainan, Taiwan, and those in a graphite-electrode producing plant during the graphitization process. It is obvious that such substantially high concentrations of PAHs and TSP constitute a potential health hazard to people working in or visiting the temple.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00146-2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. A. Bjφrseth, T. Ramdahl, in: A. Bjφrseth, T. Ramdahl (Eds.), Handbook of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Vol. 2, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1985, p. 1.
  2. Kawai, 1967, Arch. Environ. Health, 14, 859, 10.1080/00039896.1967.10664852 · DOI
  3. National Research Council (NRC), Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Evaluation of Sources and Effects, Committee on Pyrene and Selected Analogues, Board on Toxicology and Environmental Health Hazard, Commission on Life Sciences, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1983.
  4. Lau, 1997, Chemosphere, 34, 1623, 10.1016/S0045-6535(97)00458-X · DOI
  5. Fine, 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 2352, 10.1021/es981039v · DOI
  6. Huynh, 1991, Sci. Total Environ., 102, 241, 10.1016/0048-9697(91)90318-9 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cheng, 1995, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 23, 271, 10.1080/02786829508965312 · DOI
  8. Lin, 1994, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 53, 374
  9. Lin, 1994, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 53, 895
  10. Li, 2000, Atmos. Environ., 34, 611, 10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00171-5 · DOI
  11. Viau, 2000, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 73, 331, 10.1007/s004209900112 · DOI
  12. Schauer, 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1566, 10.1021/es980076j · DOI
  13. Nolte, 1999, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 3313, 10.1021/es990122v · DOI
  14. Lin, 2000, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 64, 817, 10.1007/s0012800076 · DOI
  15. He, 1991, Environ. Health Perspect., 94, 9, 10.2307/3431286 · DOI
  16. Angerer, 1997, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 69, 323, 10.1007/s004200050155 · DOI
  17. Gündel, 2000, Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health, 73, 270, 10.1007/s004200050427 · DOI
  18. Gibbs, 1985, J. Occup. Med., 27, 761, 10.1097/00043764-198511000-00016 · DOI
  19. National Research Council (NRC), Indoor Pollutants, Committee on Indoor Pollutants, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1981.
  20. Schoenotol, 1967, Nature, 216, 612, 10.1038/216612a0 · DOI
  21. Rasmussen, 1987, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 38, 827, 10.1007/BF01616708 · DOI
  22. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area, List of MAK and BAT Values, Report 35, Wiley, Weinheim, 1999.
  23. US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), Toxicological Review of Naphthalene, CAS no. 91-20-3, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1998.
  24. Meek, 1994, Environ. Carcino. Ecotoxicol. Rev., C12, 443, 10.1080/10590509409373459 · DOI
  25. Lee, 1995, Sci. Total Environ., 159, 185, 10.1016/0048-9697(95)04323-S · DOI
  26. W.J. Lee, The Determination of Dry Deposition Velocities for Ambient Gases and Particles, Ph.D. Thesis, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, 1991.
  27. Y.F. Wang, PAH Characteristics in the Ambient Air of Traffic-Source, Master Thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, 1994.
  28. Chuang, 1991, Atmos. Environ., 25B-3, 369, 10.1016/0957-1272(91)90008-3 · DOI
  29. Mitra, 1995, Atmos. Environ., 29, 3345, 10.1016/1352-2310(95)00214-J · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lin, T.-C., Chang, F.-H., Hsieh, J.-H., Chao, H.-R., & Chao, M.-R.
Affiliations
National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lin, Ta-Chang
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Hazardous Materials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-11
Volume
95
Issue
1-2
Pages
1-12
ISSN
0304-3894 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00146-2
OpenAlex
W1981211406
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Hazardous Materials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, total suspended particulates, incense burning, indoor air pollution, indoor-outdoor concentration ratio, acenaphthylene, naphthalene, phenanthrene, fluoranthene, acenaphthene, human exposure, health risks
MeSH terms
Humans, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Religion, Taiwan, Air Pollution, Indoor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review