Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 412

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Historical monetary policy analysis and the Taylor rule

Open access
Orphanides, Athanasios·2003·Journal of Monetary Economics

Abstract

This study examines the usefulness of the Taylor-rule framework as an organizing device for describing the policy debate and evolution of monetary policy in the United States. Monetary policy during the 1920s and since the 1951 Treasury-Federal Reserve Accord can be broadly interpreted in terms of this framework with rather surprising consistency. In broad terms, during these periods policy has been generally formulated in a forward-looking manner with price stability and economic stability serving as implicit or explicit guides. As early as the 1920s, measures of real economic activity relative to "normal" or "potential" supply appear to have influenced policy analysis and deliberations. Confidence in such measures as guides for activist monetary policy proved counterproductive at times, resulting in excessive activism, such as during the Great Inflation and at the brink of the Great Depression. Policy during the past two decades is broadly consistent with natural-growth targeting variants of the Taylor rule that exhibit less activism.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00065-5

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Batini, N., Nelson, E., 2000. Optimal horizons for inflation targeting. Bank of England Working Paper 119, July. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.237150
  2. Bernanke, 1997, Inflation targeting, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 97, 10.1257/jep.11.2.97 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Bryant, R.C., Hooper, P., Mann, C. (Eds.), 1993. Evaluating Policy Regimes: New Research in Empirical Macroeconomics. Brookings, Washington, DC.
  4. Burgess, W.R., 1924. Fluctuations in retail and wholesale trade. In: Persons, W.M. et al. (Eds.), The Problem of Business Forecasting, Papers presented at the Eighty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington DC, December 27–29, 1923. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
  5. Burgess, W.R., 1927b. What the Federal Reserve System is doing to promote business activity. In: Stabilizing Business, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, April 8, 1927 Meeting, Columbia University, New York, 1927.
  6. Burgess, 1930, Guide to bank of issue policy, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 13, 508, 10.2307/1172646 · doi:10.2307/1172646
  7. Cecchetti, S., Genberg, H., Wadhwani, S., 2002. Asset prices in a flexible inflation targeting framework. NBER Working Paper 8970, June. · doi:10.3386/w8970
  8. Clarida, 1999, The science of monetary policy, Journal of Economic Literature, 37, 1661, 10.1257/jel.37.4.1661 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Clarida, 2000, Monetary policy rules and macroeconomic stability, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 147, 10.1162/003355300554692 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Cooper, 1972, Simulations of monetary rules in the FRB-MIT-Penn model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 4, 384, 10.2307/1991045 · doi:10.2307/1991045
  11. Cooper, 1974, Monetary and fiscal policy in the fully stochastic St. Louis econometric model, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 6, 1, 10.2307/1991080 · doi:10.2307/1991080
  12. Croushore, D., 1993. Introducing: the survey of professional forecasters. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, Business Review, November/December, pp. 3–13.
  13. Fisher, 1923, The business cycle largely a ‘dance of the dollar’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 18, 1024, 10.1080/01621459.1923.10502134 · doi:10.1080/01621459.1923.10502134
  14. Fisher, I., 1924. Fluctuations in price-levels. In: Persons W.M. et al. (Eds.), The Problem of Business Forecasting, Papers presented at the Eighty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington DC, December 27–29, 1923. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
  15. Fisher, I., 1926. A statistical relation between unemployment and price changes. International Labor Review 13(6) 785-92. (Reprinted in Journal of Political Economy 81(2, Part 1) 496–502, March–April 1973).
  16. Fischer, 1973, Stabilization policy and lags, Journal of Political Economy, 81, 847, 10.1086/260085 · doi:10.1086/260085
  17. Friedman, M. 1968. The role of monetary policy. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings, vol. 58, No. 1, March 1–17.
  18. Gaspar, 2002, Monetary policy, price stability and output gap stabilization, International Finance, 5, 193, 10.1111/1468-2362.00094 · DOI
  19. Goldenweiser, E., Hagen, E.E., 1944. Jobs after the war. Federal Reserve Bulletin 30 (5), 424–431, May.
  20. Goodfriend, 1991, Interest rates and the conduct of monetary policy, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series, 34, 7, 10.1016/0167-2231(91)90002-M · DOI
  21. Greenspan, A., 1997. Rules vs. discretionary monetary policy. Remarks at the 15th Anniversary Conference of the Center for Economic Policy Research at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, September 5.
  22. Henderson, 1993, A comparison of some basic monetary policy regimes for open economies, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 221, 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90011-K · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90011-k
  23. Hetzel, 2001, The treasury-fed accord, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, Economic Quarterly, 87, 33
  24. King, W.I., 1924. Trade cycles and factory production. In: Persons W.M. et al. (Eds.), The Problem of Business Forecasting, Papers presented at the Eighty-Fifth Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association, Washington DC, December 27–29, 1923. Houghton-Mifflin, Boston.
  25. Laubach, 2001, Measuring the NAIRU, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 218, 10.1162/00346530151143761 · doi:10.1162/00346530151143761
  26. Laubach, T., Williams, J.C., 2001. Measuring the natural rate of interest. Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2001-56, Federal Reserve Board, November. · DOI
  27. Leffingwell, 1921, The discount policy of the Federal Reserve Banks, American Economic Review, 11, 30
  28. Levin, 2003, The performance of forecast-based monetary policy rules under model uncertainty, American Economic Review, 93, 622, 10.1257/000282803322157016 · DOI
  29. McCallum, 1988, Robustness properties of a rule for monetary policy, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 29, 173, 10.1016/0167-2231(88)90011-5 · DOI · Paper page
  30. McCallum, 1990, Could a monetary base rule have prevented the Great Depression?, Journal of Monetary Economics, 26, 3, 10.1016/0304-3932(90)90029-4 · doi:10.1016/0304-3932(90)90029-4
  31. McCallum, 1993, Discretion versus policy rules in practice, two critical points, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 215, 10.1016/0167-2231(93)90010-T · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(93)90010-t
  32. McCallum, 2000, Alternative monetary policy rules, FRB Richmond Economic Quarterly, 86, 49
  33. McCallum, 2001, Should monetary policy respond strongly to output gaps?, American Economic Review, 91, 258, 10.1257/aer.91.2.258 · doi:10.1257/aer.91.2.258
  34. Meltzer, 1987, Limits of short-run stabilization policy, Economic Inquiry, 25, 1, 10.1111/j.1465-7295.1987.tb00718.x · DOI
  35. Meltzer, A.H., 2003. A History of the Federal Reserve: Vol. I. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  36. Miller, 1921, Federal reserve policy, American Economic Review, 11, 177
  37. Mishkin, F.S., 2002. The role of output stabilization in the conduct of monetary policy. NBER Working Paper, 9291, October. · doi:10.3386/w9291
  38. Okun, A., 1962. Potential output: its measurement and significance. In: American Statistical Association 1962 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Section. American Statistical Association, Washington, DC.
  39. Orphanides, A., 2000. Activist stabilization policy and inflation: the Taylor rule in the 1970s. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 2000-13, Federal Reserve Board, February. · DOI
  40. Orphanides, 2001, Monetary policy rules based on real-time data, American Economic Review, 91, 964, 10.1257/aer.91.4.964 · DOI
  41. Orphanides, 2002, Monetary policy rules and the great inflation, American Economic Review, 92, 115, 10.1257/000282802320189104 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Orphanides, A., 2003a. Monetary policy rules, macroeconomic stability and inflation: a view from the trenches. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, forthcoming. · DOI
  43. Orphanides, 2003, Monetary policy evaluation with noisy information, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 605, 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00027-8 · DOI · Paper page
  44. Orphanides, 2003, The quest for prosperity without inflation, Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, 633, 10.1016/S0304-3932(03)00028-X · DOI · Paper page
  45. Orphanides, A., 2003d. Monetary policy in deflation: the liquidity trap in history and practice. Working Paper, April. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.512962
  46. Orphanides, 2002, The unreliability of output gap estimates in real time, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 569, 10.1162/003465302760556422 · DOI
  47. Orphanides, A., van Norden, S., 2003. The Reliability of Inflation Forecasts Based on Output Gap Estimates in Real Time. CIRANO Scientific Series 2003s-1, January 2003. · doi:10.2139/ssrn.655230
  48. Orphanides, A., Wieland, V., 1998. Price stability and monetary policy effectiveness when nominal interest rates are bounded at zero. Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper 1998–35, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. · DOI
  49. Orphanides, 2000, Efficient monetary policy design near price stability, Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 14, 327, 10.1006/jjie.2000.0452 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Orphanides, A., Williams, J.C., 2002. Robust monetary policy rules with unknown natural rates. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 2002, pp. 63–145. · DOI
  51. Orphanides, A., Williams, J.C., 2003. Imperfect Knowledge, inflation expectations and monetary policy. In: Woodford, M. (Ed.), Inflation Targeting. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, forthcoming. · doi:10.3386/w9884
  52. Orphanides, 2000, Errors in the measurement of the output gap and the design of monetary policy, Journal of Economics and Business, 52, 117, 10.1016/S0148-6195(99)00031-4 · DOI
  53. Poole, 1970, Optimal choice of monetary policy instruments in a simple stochastic macro model, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84, 197, 10.2307/1883009 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Razzak, W., 2003. Is the Taylor rule really different from the McCallum rule? Contemporary Economic Policy, forthcoming. · doi:10.1093/cep/byg024
  55. Romer, 2000, Federal Reserve Information and the Behavior of Interest Rates, American Economic Review, 90, 429, 10.1257/aer.90.3.429 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Romer, 2002, A rehabilitation of monetary policy in the 1950s, American Economic Review, 92, 121, 10.1257/000282802320189113 · doi:10.1257/000282802320189113
  57. Sack, 2000, Interest-rate smoothing and optimal monetary policy, Journal of Economics and Business, 52, 205, 10.1016/S0148-6195(99)00030-2 · DOI
  58. Samuelson, P., 1951. Principles and rules in modern fiscal policy. Reprinted in: Stiglitz, J. (Ed.), The Collected Scientific Papers of Paul A. Samuelson, Volume II. MIT, Cambridge, MA, 1966.
  59. Snyder, 1923, A new index of the volume of trade, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 18, 949, 10.2307/2965657 · doi:10.2307/2965657
  60. Sprague, 1921, The discount policy of the Federal Reserve Banks, American Economic Review, 11, 16
  61. Taylor, 1985, What would nominal GNP targeting do to the business cycle, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 22, 31, 10.1016/0167-2231(85)90027-2 · doi:10.1016/0167-2231(85)90027-2
  62. Tobin, 1983, Monetary policy, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 15, 506, 10.2307/1992166 · doi:10.2307/1992166
  63. Walsh, 2003, Speed limit policies, American Economic Review, 93, 265, 10.1257/000282803321455278 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Williams, J.C., 1999. Simple rules for monetary policy. Finance and Economics Discussion Series, 99-12, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, February. · DOI · Paper page
  65. Woodford, M., 1999. Optimal monetary policy inertia. NBER Working Paper 7261, July. · doi:10.3386/w7261
  66. Woodford, M., 2002. Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, (in preparation).
  67. Yohe, 1990, The intellectual milieu at the federal reserve board in the 1920s, History of Political Economy, 22, 465, 10.1215/00182702-22-3-465 · doi:10.1215/00182702-22-3-465
  68. Zarnowitz, 1993, Twenty-two years of the NBER-ASA quarterly economic surveys

Cited by

See all 412

Metadata

Authors
Orphanides, A.
Venue
Journal of Monetary Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
983-1022
ISSN
0304-3932 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167359167
Cited by
412
References
2
FWCI
39.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Historical monetary policy analysis and the Taylor rule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00065-5
The paper
Orphanides, A. (2003). Historical monetary policy analysis and the Taylor rule. Journal of Monetary Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3932(03)00065-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.