Cited by 67Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Magnetic resonance lipid signals in rat brain after experimental stroke correlate with neutral lipid accumulation

Gasparovic, Charles, Rosenberg, Gary A., Wallace, James A., Estrada, Eduardo Y., Roberts, Kristianna, Pastuszyn, Andrzej, Ahmed, Waseem, Graham, Glenn D.·2001·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) signals from lipids in brain have been observed to increase after ischemic brain injury. However, neither the chemical identity nor the cellular location of these lipids has been established. The aim of the present study was to identify the origin of MRS lipid signals in rat brain after temporary (90 min) middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). Fatty acyl proton signals were detected by short-echo one and two dimensional (1)H MRS in superfused brain slices from the infarcted hemisphere 1-5 days after MCAO. The intensities of these signals were strongly correlated with the amount of triacylglyceride and cholesterol ester in lipid extracts from the samples (r(2)=0.96, P<0.05) and were not correlated with the amount of free fatty acids in the tissue. Histological staining of tissue revealed the presence of neutral lipid droplets in infarcted regions. Dual labeling by immunohistochemistry demonstrated that these droplets were localized to microglia/macrophage (OX-42-labeled cells). These results strongly suggest that (1)H MRS lipid signals from brain after stroke arise from microglia/macrophage phagocytosis of cellular membranes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01616-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ischemia is correlated with both increased lipid peroxidation and neutral lipid accumulation in the brain.

    “Ischemia is correlated with both increased lipid peroxidation and neutral lipid accumulation in the brain (Yoshida et al., 1982; Gasparovic et al., 2001; Ioannou et al., 2019).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gasparovic, C., Rosenberg, G. A., Wallace, J. A., Estrada, E. Y., Roberts, K., Pastuszyn, A., Ahmed, W., & Graham, G. D.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Gasparovic, Charles
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-03
Volume
301
Issue
2
Pages
87-90
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110581704
Cited by
67
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01 NS21169-12, R01NS021169)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
1H NMR, ischemic stroke, middle cerebral artery occlusion, neutral lipid accumulation, triglycerides, cholesterol esters, microglia/macrophages, OX-42, lipid droplets, phagocytosis, membrane lipids
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Chemistry, Cerebral Infarction, Cholesterol Esters, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Protons, Triglycerides, Biomarkers, Rats, Wistar, Stroke, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review