Cited by 150Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsSexual Differentiation and DisordersEstrogen and related hormone effects

Exposure to bisphenol A during the fetal and suckling periods disrupts sexual differentiation of the locus coeruleus and of behavior in the rat

Kubo, Kazuhiko, Arai, Okio, Ogata, Rika, Omura, Minoru, Hori, Tetsuro, Aou, Shuji·2001·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

This study tested the effect of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) early in life on the sexual differentiation in the brain and behavior in Wistar rats. We administered BPA only to mother rats during pregnancy and lactation at a dosage of approximately 1.5 mg/kg per day far less than the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL; 50 mg/kg per day). Control female offspring showed a higher activity, a lower avoidance memory, and larger locus coeruleus than the male controls, while the BPA-exposed group did not show any sexual dimorphism. BPA did not affect the reproductive organs or sex hormones. Our results suggest that the current methods to determine the NOAEL of artificial industrial chemicals may not be sufficient to detect a disruption of the sexual differentiation in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(01)01760-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubo, K., Arai, O., Ogata, R., Omura, M., Hori, T., & Aou, S.
Affiliations
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • Dokkyo University (JP)
Corresponding author
Aou, Shuji
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
304
Issue
1-2
Pages
73-76
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007350333
Cited by
150
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
Keywords
bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, sexual differentiation of the brain, locus coeruleus, prenatal exposure, suckling period, maternal exposure, sexual dimorphism, avoidance memory, behavior, no-observed-adverse-effect level, developmental neurotoxicity
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Benzhydryl Compounds, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Female, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Phenols, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Differentiation, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review