Exposure to bisphenol A during the fetal and suckling periods disrupts sexual differentiation of the locus coeruleus and of behavior in the rat
Abstract
This study tested the effect of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) early in life on the sexual differentiation in the brain and behavior in Wistar rats. We administered BPA only to mother rats during pregnancy and lactation at a dosage of approximately 1.5 mg/kg per day far less than the no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL; 50 mg/kg per day). Control female offspring showed a higher activity, a lower avoidance memory, and larger locus coeruleus than the male controls, while the BPA-exposed group did not show any sexual dimorphism. BPA did not affect the reproductive organs or sex hormones. Our results suggest that the current methods to determine the NOAEL of artificial industrial chemicals may not be sufficient to detect a disruption of the sexual differentiation in the brain.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
BPA has been demonstrated to be associated with alteration in sexual dimorphisms of the CNS and behavioral impairment in rats.
“BPA has been demonstrated to be associated with alteration in sexual dimorphisms of the central nervous system (CNS) and behavioral impairment in rats1.”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hormones and endocrine-disrupting chemicals: low-dose effects and nonmonotonic dose responses
Vandenberg, L. N., Colborn, T., Hayes, T. B., Heindel, J. J., Jacobs, D. R., Lee, D.-H., Shioda, T., Soto, A. M., vom Saal, F. S., Welshons, W. V., et al. (2012) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2011-1050 · Cited by 3,209 · see citing works
Xu, X.-H., Zhang, J., Wang, Y.-M., Ye, Y.-P., & Luo, Q.-Q. (2010) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2010.02.012 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Kajta, M., & Wójtowicz, A. K. (2013) · Pharmacological Reports · doi:10.1016/s1734-1140(13)71524-x · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Liu, Z.-H., Ding, J.-J., Yang, Q.-Q., Song, H.-Z., Chen, X.-T., Xu, Y., Xiao, G.-R., & Wang, H.-L. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep32492 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
“910, respectively) or main factor of sex (F(1, 35) = 0.”
Background
- Authors
- Kubo, K., Arai, O., Ogata, R., Omura, M., Hori, T., & Aou, S.
- Affiliations
- Kyushu University (JP)
- Dokkyo University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Aou, Shuji
- Venue
- Neuroscience Letters
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 304
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 73-76
- ISSN
- 0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007350333
- Cited by
- 150
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 9.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, sexual differentiation of the brain, locus coeruleus, prenatal exposure, suckling period, maternal exposure, sexual dimorphism, avoidance memory, behavior, no-observed-adverse-effect level, developmental neurotoxicity
- MeSH terms
- Bisphenol A Compounds, Animals, Avoidance Learning, Benzhydryl Compounds, Estrogens, Non-Steroidal, Female, Locus Coeruleus, Male, Phenols, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Sexual Behavior, Animal, Sex Differentiation, Rats, Wistar, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review