Cited by 104Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchReceptor Mechanisms and SignalingAmino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism

Tangential synaptic distribution of NMDA and AMPA receptors in rat neocortex

Kharazia, V.N, Weinberg, R.J·1997·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

We performed an electron microscopic study in layers II-III of S-1 in rats, using postembedding immunogold histochemistry to compare the synaptic distribution of N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (assessed with an antibody for the NMDAR1 subunit) with that of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionate (AMPA) receptors (assessed with an antibody for the GluR2/3 subunit). Labeling for each receptor was concentrated at active zones of asymmetric synapses. Analysis of the tangential position of gold particles along the postsynaptic active zone revealed that NMDA receptors were at highest concentration in the middle of the synaptic apposition, whereas AMPA receptors were concentrated in an annulus away from its center. These data support the view that the two types of receptors are anchored by distinct subsynaptic assemblies, and raise the possibility of independent synaptic microdomains.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(97)00846-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • NMDARs tend to be concentrated in the middle of the PSD with little overlap with AMPARs.

    “NMDARs tend to be concentrated in the middle of the PSD with little overlap with AMPARs (253–255).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [255]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 104

Authors
Kharazia, V. N., & Weinberg, R. J.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Weinberg, R.J
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-11
Volume
238
Issue
1-2
Pages
41-44
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089078464
Cited by
104
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns029879-08)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-29879)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism
Keywords
NMDA receptor, AMPA receptors, synaptic distribution, asymmetric synapses, postsynaptic density
MeSH terms
Animals, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Synaptic Membranes, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, AMPA, Neocortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review