Cited by 149Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Hippocampal volume and neuronal number in Ts65Dn mice: a murine model of down syndrome.

Insausti, A.M., Megı́as, M., Crespo, D., Cruz-Orive, L.M., Dierssen, M., Vallina, T.F., Insausti, R., Flórez, J.·1998·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Ts65Dn mouse displays a partial triplication of chromosome 16 and is adopted as a model for Down syndrome (DS). It is known that Ts65Dn mice present memory deficiencies. In order to gain insight into the cause of these deficiencies, we studied the possibility of changes in volumes and neuronal numbers in different regions of the hippocampus (dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2 and CA1) in trisomic mice as compared to control littermates using stereological methods. The mean hippocampal volumes of Ts65Dn mice did not show significant differences as compared to controls, except in CA2 where there was a barely significant decrease. However, mean neuron number was significantly lower in Ts65Dn mice than in controls in dentate gyrus (43.7 x 10(4), CV 21%, n = 5, vs. 30.4 x 10(4), CV 18.1%, n = 4) and higher in CA3 (23.1 x 10(4), CV 18.9% vs. 33.3 x 10(4), CV 14.9%). These quantitative changes may account for the memory deficiencies observed in Ts65Dn mice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00641-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar to human studies, neuronal hypocellularity has been detected in multiple structures including the cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus in postnatal trisomic Ts65Dn animals.

    “Similar to human studies, neuronal hypocellularity has been detected in multiple structures including the cortex, cerebellum, and hippocampus in postnatal trisomic animals (Insausti et al., 1998; Baxter et al., 2000; Olson et al., 2004; Roper et al., 2006; Chakrabarti et al., 2010; Aziz et al., 2018).”

    From Neurodevelopment in Down syndrome: Concordance in humans and models (2022) · cites this paper as Insausti et al., 1998

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 149

Authors
Insausti, A. M., Megı́as, M., Crespo, D., Cruz-Orive, L. M., Dierssen, M., Vallina, T. F., Insausti, R., & Flórez, J.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Cantabria (ES)
  • Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Corresponding author
Insausti, R.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-09
Volume
253
Issue
3
Pages
175-178
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088404776
Cited by
149
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 10
FWCI
7.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
Ts65Dn mouse model, Down syndrome, trisomy 16, hippocampus, neuron number, hippocampal volume, dentate gyrus, CA3, CA2, CA1, memory impairment, stereology
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Count, Disease Models, Animal, Down Syndrome, Hippocampus, Immunohistochemistry, Mice, Neurologic Mutants, Trisomy, Dentate Gyrus, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review