Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials
Abstract
Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are brain responses to activation of skin nociceptors by laser heat stimuli. LEPs consist of three components: N1, N2, and P2. Previous reports have suggested that in contrast to earlier activities (N1), LEPs responses after 230-250 ms (N2-P2) are modulated by attention to painful laser stimuli. However, the experimental paradigms used were not designed to specify the attentional processes involved in these LEP modulations. We investigated the effects of selective spatial attention and oddball tasks on LEPs. CO(2) laser stimuli of two different intensities were delivered on the dorsum of both hands of ten subjects. One intensity was frequently presented, and the other rarely. Subjects were asked to pay attention to stimuli delivered on one hand and to count rare stimuli, while ignoring stimuli on the other hand. Frequent and rare attended stimuli evoked enhanced N160 (N1) and N230 (N2) components in comparison to LEPs from unattended stimuli. Both components showed scalp distribution contralateral to the stimulus location. The vertex P400 (P2) was unaffected by spatial attention and stimulus location, but its amplitude increased after rare stimuli, whether attended or unattended. An additional parietal P600 component was induced by the attended rare stimuli. It is suggested that several attentional processes can modify nociceptive processing in the brain at different stages. LEP activities in the time-range of N1 and N2 (120-270 ms) showed evidence of processes modulated by the direction of spatial attention. Conversely, processes underlying P2 (400 ms) were not affected by spatial attention, but by the probability of the stimulus. This probability effect was not due to P3b-related processes that were observed at a later latency (600 ms). Indeed, P600 could be seen as a P3b evoked by conscious detection of rare targets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LEPs reflect temporally distinct cortical processes specifically evoked by the activation of Aδ-fibres and are differentially modulated by cognitive and pharmacological interventions.
“LEPs reflect temporally distinct cortical processes specifically evoked by the activation of Aδ‐fibres 31 and are differentially modulated by cognitive 32, 33, 34 and pharmacological 35 interventions.”
From The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Cross‐Over Study Using Laser‐Evoked Potentials (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
The P2 component has been shown to be modulated specifically by factors reflecting the salience of noxious stimuli and to reflect multimodal (rather than somatosensory-specific) processes.
“The P2 component has been shown to be modulated specifically by factors reflecting the salience of noxious stimuli (e.g. stimulus probability) 33, 59, 69 and to reflect multimodal (rather than somatosensory‐specific) processes 61.”
From The Analgesic Effect of Oxytocin in Humans: A Double‐Blind, Placebo‐Controlled Cross‐Over Study Using Laser‐Evoked Potentials (2016) · cites this paper as [33]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 81 · Cited by 274
- Authors
- Legrain, V., Guérit, J.-M., Bruyer, R., & Plaghki, L.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Legrain, Valéry
- ORCID
- Legrain, Valéry
- Venue
- Pain
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 21-39
- ISSN
- 0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050874268
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 6.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Pain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- laser-evoked potentials, nociceptive processing, stimulus probability, target detection, N1 component, N2 component, P2 component, P3b, P600, oddball paradigm, pain perception
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Lasers, Functional Laterality, Male, Nociceptors, Reaction Time, Space Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review