Cited by 274Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesPain Management and Placebo Effect

Attentional modulation of the nociceptive processing into the human brain: selective spatial attention, probability of stimulus occurrence, and target detection effects on laser evoked potentials

Legrain, Valéry, Guérit, Jean-Michel, Bruyer, Raymond, Plaghki, Léon·2002·Pain

Abstract

Laser evoked potentials (LEPs) are brain responses to activation of skin nociceptors by laser heat stimuli. LEPs consist of three components: N1, N2, and P2. Previous reports have suggested that in contrast to earlier activities (N1), LEPs responses after 230-250 ms (N2-P2) are modulated by attention to painful laser stimuli. However, the experimental paradigms used were not designed to specify the attentional processes involved in these LEP modulations. We investigated the effects of selective spatial attention and oddball tasks on LEPs. CO(2) laser stimuli of two different intensities were delivered on the dorsum of both hands of ten subjects. One intensity was frequently presented, and the other rarely. Subjects were asked to pay attention to stimuli delivered on one hand and to count rare stimuli, while ignoring stimuli on the other hand. Frequent and rare attended stimuli evoked enhanced N160 (N1) and N230 (N2) components in comparison to LEPs from unattended stimuli. Both components showed scalp distribution contralateral to the stimulus location. The vertex P400 (P2) was unaffected by spatial attention and stimulus location, but its amplitude increased after rare stimuli, whether attended or unattended. An additional parietal P600 component was induced by the attended rare stimuli. It is suggested that several attentional processes can modify nociceptive processing in the brain at different stages. LEP activities in the time-range of N1 and N2 (120-270 ms) showed evidence of processes modulated by the direction of spatial attention. Conversely, processes underlying P2 (400 ms) were not affected by spatial attention, but by the probability of the stimulus. This probability effect was not due to P3b-related processes that were observed at a later latency (600 ms). Indeed, P600 could be seen as a P3b evoked by conscious detection of rare targets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(02)00051-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 81 · Cited by 274

Authors
Legrain, V., Guérit, J.-M., Bruyer, R., & Plaghki, L.
Affiliations
  • UCLouvain (BE)
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE)
Corresponding author
Legrain, Valéry
Venue
Pain
Published
2002-09
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
21-39
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2050874268
Cited by
274
References
81
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 25
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
laser-evoked potentials, nociceptive processing, stimulus probability, target detection, N1 component, N2 component, P2 component, P3b, P600, oddball paradigm, pain perception
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory, Female, Hot Temperature, Humans, Lasers, Functional Laterality, Male, Nociceptors, Reaction Time, Space Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review