Cited by 203Pain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Effects of TENS frequency, intensity and stimulation site parameter manipulation on pressure pain thresholds in healthy human subjects

Chesterton, Linda S, Foster, Nadine E, Wright, Christine C, Baxter, David G., Barlas, Panos·2003·Pain

Abstract

Unlabelled This study evaluated the effects of varying frequency, intensity and stimulation site, of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in an experimental model of pain. In a double-blind design 240 volunteers were randomised to one of six experimental TENS groups, a sham TENS or control (n=30 per group; gender balanced). Two TENS frequencies (110 or 4 Hz) and two intensities (strong but comfortable or highest tolerable) at a fixed pulse duration (200 micros) were applied at three sites relative to the measurement site (segmentally, extrasegmentally or a combination of these), for 30 min. Pressure pain thresholds (PPT) were measured using a pressure algometer, in the first dorsal interosseous muscle, every 10 min, during stimulation and for a further 30 min. The high frequency, high intensity segmental, and combined stimulation groups, showed rapid onset and significant hypoalgesic effects. This effect was sustained for 20 min post-stimulation in the high frequency segmental group. All other TENS intervention groups showed hypoalgesic responses similar to the sham TENS group, and none of these groups reached a clinically significant hypoalgesic level. Conclusions The role of TENS frequency, intensity and site are pivotal to achieving optimal hypoalgesic effects, during and after stimulation. Clinical applications of these parameter combinations require further investigations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00292-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chesterton, L. S., Foster, N. E., Wright, C. C., Baxter, D. G., & Barlas, P.
Affiliations
  • Keele University (GB)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Corresponding author
Chesterton, Linda S
Venue
Pain
Published
2003-11
Volume
106
Issue
1
Pages
73-80
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026715651
Cited by
203
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, stimulation site, pressure pain threshold, hypoalgesia, pain modulation, first dorsal interosseous muscle, sham stimulation, experimental pain
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pressure, Reference Values, Pain Threshold, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review