Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification of local and referred muscle pain in humans after sequential i.m. injections of hypertonic saline

Graven-Nielsen, Thomas, Arendt-Nielsen, Lars, Svensson, Peter, Jensen, Troels Staehelin·1997·Pain

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to test (1) whether muscle pain is influenced by temporal and spatial summation, and (2) whether sequential noxious muscle stimuli applied at hourly interstimulus-intervals could produce an increased sensation of pain due to central hyperexcitability. In the study eleven healthy men were exposed to computer-controlled intramuscular infusion of saline (5%) given over 20 s in m. tibialis anterior (m. TA). The intensities of local and referred pain were assessed by recordings on visual analogue scales (VAS), and the areas of local pain (around the injection site) and referred pain (outside the local pain area) were localised by the subject. Three experiments were performed. Experiment 1: Each subject participated in three tests separated by one week: (a) bolus (0.4 ml saline) infusion at one site; (b) four sequential infusions (0.1 ml saline) given at 90-s interstimulus-intervals at one site; and (c) four sequential infusions (0.1 ml saline) given at 360-s interstimulus-intervals at one site. Experiment 2: This was performed as experiment 1, but the infusions were given at spatially separated sites. Experiment 3. Hypertonic saline (0.1 ml) was injected one, four and 24 h after the sequential infusions (90-s interstimulus-intervals) given at spatially separated sites. The highest VAS peak and the largest local and referred pain areas were found after the bolus infusions. Compared to the first infusion, significant increases were found in the VAS peak, the size of the local pain area, and the size of the referred pain area (non-significant) after the four sequential infusions given at 90-s interstimulus-intervals (temporal summation). Four spatially separated infusions given simultaneously produced a higher VAS peak, a larger local pain area, and a larger referred pain area (non-significant) compared to one infusion (spatial summation). The infusion given 4 h after the sequential infusions tended to produce an increase in the referred pain area and in the pain intensity. In all three experiments significant correlations were found between the VAS peak and the size of the local (R = 0.64, P < 0.0001, n = 231) and referred (R = 0.47, P < 0.0001, n = 231) pain areas. Based on the above results it can be concluded that experimental muscle pain is influenced by temporal and spatial summation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03243-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 212

Metadata

Authors
Graven-Nielsen, T., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Svensson, P., & Jensen, T. S.
Venue
Pain
Published
1997-01
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
111-117
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071567551
Cited by
212
References
1
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of local and referred muscle pain in humans after sequential i.m. injections of hypertonic saline. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03243-5
The paper
Graven-Nielsen, T., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Svensson, P., & Jensen, T. S. (1997). Quantification of local and referred muscle pain in humans after sequential i.m. injections of hypertonic saline. Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(96)03243-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.