Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 516

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The market for catastrophe risk: a clinical examination

Open access
Froot, Kenneth A.·2001·Journal of Financial Economics

Abstract

This paper examines the market for catastrophe event risk --i.e., financial claims that are linked to losses associated with natural hazards, such as hurricanes and earthquakes.This market is in transition as new approaches for transferring risk are being explored.The paper studies several recent transactions by USAA which use reinsurance capacity from capital markets, rather than only from reinsurers.We identify two puzzles concerning the cat protection purchased in these transactions: there is no coverage for the largest, most severe events; and premiums appear well above actuarial value.We demonstrate that both features deviate from what theory would predict, yet are characteristic of many transactions, not simply those of USAA.We then explore a number of possible explanations for the facts.The most compelling are combinations of capital market imperfections and market power on the part of reinsurers.Conclusions for broader capital market and risk management issues are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00052-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 516

Metadata

Authors
Froot, K. A.
Venue
Journal of Financial Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-05
Volume
60
Issue
2-3
Pages
529-571
ISSN
0304-405X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125148400
Cited by
516
References
1
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The market for catastrophe risk: a clinical examination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00052-6
The paper
Froot, K. A. (2001). The market for catastrophe risk: a clinical examination. Journal of Financial Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(01)00052-6

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.