The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Exchange anisotropy — a review
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exchange bias in nanostructures
Nogués, J., Sort, J., Langlais, V., Skumryev, V., Suriñach, S., Muñoz, J. S., & Baró, M. D. (2005) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.08.004 · Cited by 1,925
Size dependence of nanostructures: Impact of bond order deficiency
Sun, C. Q. (2007) · Progress in Solid State Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2006.03.001 · Cited by 873
Reversible electric control of exchange bias in a multiferroic field-effect device
Wu, S. M., Cybart, S. A., Yu, P., Rossell, M. D., Zhang, J. X., Ramesh, R., & Dynes, R. C. (2010) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2803 · Cited by 710
Chemical effects at metal/oxide interfaces studied by x-ray-absorption spectroscopy
Regan, T. J., Ohldag, H., Stamm, C., Nolting, F., Lüning, J., Stöhr, J., & White, R. L. (2001) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.64.214422 · Cited by 594
Magnetic interactions between nanoparticles
Mørup, S., Hansen, M. F., & Frandsen, C. (2010) · Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology · doi:10.3762/bjnano.1.22 · Cited by 369
Metadata
- Authors
- Berkowitz, A. E., & Takano, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 200
- Issue
- 1-3
- Pages
- 552-570
- ISSN
- 0304-8853 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141774552
- Cited by
- 1,651
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exchange anisotropy — a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0304-8853(99)00453-9
- The paper
- Berkowitz, A. E., & Takano, K. (1999). Exchange anisotropy — a review. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-8853(99)00453-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
