Cited by 86

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Assessing the feasibility of identifying maize through the analysis of cross-shaped size and three-dimensional morphology of phytoliths in the grasslands of southeastern South America

Iriarte, José·2003·Journal of Archaeological Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0305-4403(02)00164-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phytoliths are a suitable proxy for detecting human disturbances in tropical forests, because taxa associated with human land use, such as Poaceae, Arecaceae, and Heliconiaceae, are abundant phytolith producers.

    “Phytoliths are a suitable proxy for detecting human disturbances in tropical forests, because taxa associated with human land use, such as Poaceae, Arecaceae, and Heliconiaceae, are abundant phytolith producers”
  • Maize (Zea mays) is indicated by Cross 1 phytoliths >21 μm and Wavy-top rondels.

    “Maize (Zea mays) was indicated by Cross 1 phytoliths > 21 μm and Wavy-top rondels”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Ball, 1999, Identifying inflorescence phytoliths from selected species of wheat (Triticum monococcum, T. dicoccon, and T. aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare and H. spontaneum) (Gramineae), American Journal of Botany, 86, 1615, 10.2307/2656798 · DOI
  2. Bozarth, 1987, Diagnostic opal phytoliths from rinds of selected Cucurbita species, American Antiquity, 52, 607, 10.2307/281602 · DOI
  3. Bozarth, 1993, Maize (Zea mays) cob phytoliths from a Central Kansas Great Bend Aspect archaeological site, Plains Anthropologist, 38, 279, 10.1080/2052546.1993.11931687 · DOI
  4. Burkart, 1969, vol. 2
  5. Doolittle, 1991, Phytoliths as indicators of prehistoric maize (Zea mays subsp. mays, Poaceae) cultivation, Plant Systematics and Evolution, 177, 175, 10.1007/BF00937955 · DOI
  6. Dorweiler, 1997, Developmental analysis of Teosinte glume architecturel: a key locus in the evolution of maize (Poaceae), American Journal of Botany, 84, 1313, 10.2307/2446130 · DOI
  7. J. Iriarte, E. Alonso, Opal phytoliths from southeastern Uruguay: analysis of selected native plants and modern soils, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology (unpublished manuscript).
  8. Kunoh, 1977, Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray microanalysis of dumbbell-shaped bodies in rice lamina epidermis (Oryza sativa), Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club, 104, 309, 10.2307/2484774 · DOI
  9. Mindzie, 2001, First archaeological evidence of banana cultivation in central Africa during the third millennium before present, Vegetation History and Archeobotany, 10, 1, 10.1007/PL00013367 · DOI
  10. Mulholland, 1993, A test of phytolith analysis at Big Hidatsa, North Dakota, vol. 10, 131
  11. Pearsall, 1978, Phytolith analysis of archaeological soils: evidence for maize cultivation in formative Ecuador, Science, 199, 177, 10.1126/science.199.4325.177 · DOI
  12. Pearsall, 1990, Antiquity of maize cultivation in Ecuador: summary and reevaluation of the evidence, American Antiquity, 55, 324, 10.2307/281650 · DOI
  13. Piperno, 1984, A comparison and differentiation of phytoliths from maize and wild grasses: use of morphological criteria, American Antiquity, 49, 361, 10.2307/280024 · DOI
  14. Piperno, 1998, Paleoethnobotany in the Neotropics from microfossils: new insights into ancient plant use and agricultural origins in the tropical forest, Journal of World Prehistory, 12, 393, 10.1023/A:1022812132194 · DOI
  15. Piperno, 1993, Phytoliths in the reproductive structures of maize and teosinte: implications for the study of maize evolution, Journal of Archaeological Science, 20, 337, 10.1006/jasc.1993.1021 · DOI
  16. Piperno, 1993, The nature and status of phytolith analysis, vol. 10, 9
  17. Piperno, 2000, Phytoliths in Cucurbita and other Neotropical Cucurbitaceae and their occurrence in early archaeological sites from the lowland American tropics, Journal of Archaeological Science, 27, 193, 10.1006/jasc.1999.0443 · DOI
  18. Piperno, 2000, Starch grains reveal early root crop horticulture in the Panamanian tropical forest, Nature, 407, 894, 10.1038/35038055 · DOI
  19. Pohl, 1996, Early agriculture in the Maya lowlands, Latin American Antiquity, 7, 335, 10.2307/972264 · DOI
  20. Rovner, 1996, Review of Current research in phytolith analysis: applications in archaeology and paleoecology, American Antiquity, 61, 430, 10.2307/282444 · DOI
  21. Sendulsky, 1966, Corpos siliceos de Gramineas dos Cerrados—I, Annais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 38, 159
  22. Staller, 2002, A multidisciplinary approach to understanding the initial introduction of maize into coastal Ecuador, Journal of Archaeological Science, 29, 33, 10.1006/jasc.2001.0750 · DOI
  23. Thompson, 1994, Identification of corn in food residues on utilized ceramics at the Shea site (32CS101), The Phytolitharian Newsletter, 8, 7
  24. Tubb, 1993, The inflorescence papillae of the Triticeae: a new tool for taxonomic and archaeological research, Annals of Botany, 72, 537, 10.1006/anbo.1993.1142 · DOI
  25. Umlauf, 1993, Phytolith evidence for initial period maize at Cardal, Central coast of Peru, vol. 10, 125
  26. B. Voorhies, D.J. Kennett, J.G. Jones, T.A. Wake, A middle Archaic site on the west coast of Mexico, Latin American Antiquity, 13(2) (2002) 179–200. · DOI
  27. Wilson, 1985, Phytolith analysis at Kuk, an early agricultural site in Papua, New Guinea, Archaeology in Oceania, 20, 90, 10.1002/j.1834-4453.1985.tb00115.x · DOI
  28. Zhao, 1998, Distinguishing rice (Oryza sativa Poaceae) from wild Oryza species through phytolith analysis, Economic Botany, 52, 134, 10.1007/BF02861201 · DOI
  29. Zucol, 1998, Microfitolitos de las Poaceae Argentinas, Darwiniana, 36, 29

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Iriarte, J.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-09
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
1085-1094
ISSN
0305-4403
Cited by
86
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review