Synaptic loss is accompanied by an increase in synaptic area in the dentate gyrus of aged human apolipoprotein E4 transgenic mice
Abstract
To investigate the relationship between the three isoforms of apolipoprotein E (E2, E3 and E4) and the integrity of the synaptic circuitry in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, we have estimated the synapse per neuron ratio and mean apposition zone area per synapse at the electron microscope level in the dentate gyrus of apolipoprotein E knockout and human apolipoprotein E transgenic mice aged six to 24months. During ageing, only in human apolipoprotein E4 mice was there a decrease in synapse per neuron ratio, accompanied by an increase in synaptic size. When these mice were compared with human apolipoprotein E2, apolipoprotein E knockout and wild-type mice at old age, they displayed the lowest synapse per neuron ratio, but similar apposition zone area. In contrast, as in our previous study, aged apolipoprotein E knockout mice did not show any sign of synaptic degeneration. The functional consequences of such morphological changes remain to be determined. However, if such age-related loss of synapses occurred in the brain of Alzheimer apolipoprotein E4 patients, they might be additive to pathological processes and could contribute to greater cognitive impairment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both negative effects and minor beneficial effects on neurites and synaptic functions have been associated with apoE4.
“Both negative effects and minor beneficial effects on neurites and synaptic functions have been associated with apoE4 (Cambon et al., 2000; Masliah et al., 1997; Veinbergs et al., 1999).”
From Apolipoprotein E in Synaptic Plasticity and Alzheimer’s Disease: Potential Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms (2014) · cites this paper as Cambon et al., 2000
The effects of apoE4 on synaptic plasticity were inconsistent among studies.
“the effects of apoE4 on synaptic plasticity were inconsistent among studies.”
From The role of apolipoprotein E in Alzheimer's disease (2009) · cites this paper as Cambon et al., 2000
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 63
- Authors
- Cambon, K., Davies, H. A., & Stewart, M. G.
- Affiliations
- The Open University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cambon, K
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 685-692
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2035771895
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Keywords
- APOE ε4, apolipoprotein E isoforms, synaptic loss, dentate gyrus, hippocampus, aging, synaptic degeneration, Alzheimer's disease, cognitive impairment, transgenic mice, ApoE-deficient mice
- MeSH terms
- Aging, Animals, Apolipoproteins E, Crosses, Genetic, Dendrites, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mice, Transgenic, Neurons, Synapses, Mice, Knockout, Dentate Gyrus, Mice, Apolipoprotein E4
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review