Cited by 80Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Benzodiazepines protect hippocampal neurons from degeneration after transient cerebral ischemia: an ultrastructural study

Schwartz-Bloom, R.D., Miller, K.A., Evenson, D.A., Crain, B.J., Nadler, J.V.·2000·Neuroscience

Abstract

The ability of full and partial benzodiazepine receptor agonists to prevent DNA fragmentation and neuronal death after transient cerebral ischemia was investigated in the Mongolian gerbil. Diazepam (10mg/kg, i.p.) or the partial agonist imidazenil (3mg/kg, i.p.) was administered 30 and 90min after transient forebrain ischemia produced by occlusion of the carotid arteries for 5min. Treatment with diazepam completely protected CA1b hippocampal pyramidal neurons in 94% of the animals and partially protected pyramidal neurons in 6% of the animals, as assessed with a standard Nissl stain three and four days after ischemia. DNA fragmentation was examined by the terminal dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction. Prior to cell death, there were no TUNEL-positive neurons in area CA1b. By three days after ischemia, when neuronal degeneration was nearly complete, 14 out of 16 gerbils exhibited a positive TUNEL reaction throughout area CA1b stratum pyramidale. In 13 out of 14 gerbils treated with diazepam, no TUNEL-positive neurons were observed in this region. Imidazenil was less effective than diazepam with respect to both neuroprotection and prevention of DNA fragmentation. Three days after ischemia, six out of eight gerbils treated with imidazenil showed partial to complete neuroprotection. Imidazenil completely prevented DNA fragmentation in only one of the animals; varying degrees of TUNEL reaction persisted in the remainder. To determine whether the neurons protected by diazepam ha…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00144-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz-Bloom, R. D., Miller, K. A., Evenson, D. A., Crain, B. J., & Nadler, J. V.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-06
Volume
98
Issue
3
Pages
471-484
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086233259
Cited by
80
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5p50ns006233-25)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 28791, NS 06233, R01NS028791)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
benzodiazepines, diazepam, transient cerebral ischemia, neuroprotection, hippocampal neurons, DNA fragmentation, neurodegeneration, neuronal ultrastructure, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, Mongolian gerbil, carotid artery occlusion, TUNEL, mitochondrial swelling, dendritic degeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Benzodiazepines, Ischemic Attack, Transient, Diazepam, Gerbillinae, Imidazoles, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Nerve Degeneration, Receptors, GABA-A, Apoptosis, Pyramidal Cells, Neuroprotective Agents, GABA Modulators, In Situ Nick-End Labeling, DNA Fragmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review