Activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray reduces locomotion but not mean arterial pressure in awake, freely moving rats
Abstract
Activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray produces immobility and antinociception. It has been argued that these behaviors are part of either a defensive fear response to threat or a recuperative quiescence response to deep tissue injury. Data collected in anesthetized animals showing that activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray has a hypotensive effect supports the quiescence hypothesis. Our objective was to determine whether activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray in awake, freely moving rats results in a decrease in blood pressure as it does in anesthetized animals. Changes in blood pressure produced by microinjection of the neuroexcitant D,L-homocysteic acid were measured using radio telemetry while rats were awake and while anesthetized with pentobarbital. Consistent with earlier reports, microinjection of D,L-homocysteic acid into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray caused a decrease in blood pressure in anesthetized rats. In contrast, microinjection at the same ventrolateral periaqueductal gray sites while rats were awake had no effect on blood pressure, even though the animals became immobile and heart rate decreased. Thus, the immobility evoked from ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is not associated with a fall in mean arterial pressure. Two conclusions can be drawn from these data. (1) Caution must be used in generalizing from data collected in anesthetized animals. (2) The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is as likely to contribute to defensive fear as to recuperative quiescence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Electrical or chemical stimulation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal grey produces freezing.
“In contrast, electrical or chemical stimulation of the vlPAG produces freezing [58,59].”
From Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing (2017) · cites this paper as [58]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- Morgan, M. M., & Carrive, P.
- Affiliations
- Washington State University Vancouver (US)
- UNSW Sydney (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Morgan, M.M
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 905-910
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1968821729
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, locomotion, mean arterial pressure, microinjection, immobility, anesthetic effects, heart rate, antinociception, freely moving rats
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Arousal, Blood Pressure, Fear, Heart Rate, Homocysteine, Locomotion, Male, Microinjections, Nociceptors, Pain, Periaqueductal Gray, Reflex, Startle, Rats, Wistar, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review