Cited by 69Pain Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeuroscience of respiration and sleepHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray reduces locomotion but not mean arterial pressure in awake, freely moving rats

Morgan, M.M, Carrive, P·2001·Neuroscience

Abstract

Activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray produces immobility and antinociception. It has been argued that these behaviors are part of either a defensive fear response to threat or a recuperative quiescence response to deep tissue injury. Data collected in anesthetized animals showing that activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray has a hypotensive effect supports the quiescence hypothesis. Our objective was to determine whether activation of the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray in awake, freely moving rats results in a decrease in blood pressure as it does in anesthetized animals. Changes in blood pressure produced by microinjection of the neuroexcitant D,L-homocysteic acid were measured using radio telemetry while rats were awake and while anesthetized with pentobarbital. Consistent with earlier reports, microinjection of D,L-homocysteic acid into the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray caused a decrease in blood pressure in anesthetized rats. In contrast, microinjection at the same ventrolateral periaqueductal gray sites while rats were awake had no effect on blood pressure, even though the animals became immobile and heart rate decreased. Thus, the immobility evoked from ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is not associated with a fall in mean arterial pressure. Two conclusions can be drawn from these data. (1) Caution must be used in generalizing from data collected in anesthetized animals. (2) The ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is as likely to contribute to defensive fear as to recuperative quiescence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00513-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 69

Authors
Morgan, M. M., & Carrive, P.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University Vancouver (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Morgan, M.M
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-02
Volume
102
Issue
4
Pages
905-910
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1968821729
Cited by
69
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
ventrolateral periaqueductal gray, locomotion, mean arterial pressure, microinjection, immobility, anesthetic effects, heart rate, antinociception, freely moving rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Arousal, Blood Pressure, Fear, Heart Rate, Homocysteine, Locomotion, Male, Microinjections, Nociceptors, Pain, Periaqueductal Gray, Reflex, Startle, Rats, Wistar, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review