Blockade of ventral pallidal opioid receptors induces a conditioned place aversion and attenuates acquisition of cocaine place preference in the rat
Abstract
Peripheral administration of naloxone is known to produce a conditioned place aversion and to block cocaine-induced conditioned place preference. The ventral pallidum receives a dense enkephalinergic projection from the nucleus accumbens and is implicated as a locus mediating the rewarding and reinforcing effects of psychostimulant and opiate drugs. We sought to provide evidence for the involvement of pallidal opioid receptors in modulating affective state using the place-conditioning paradigm. Microinjection of naloxone (0.01-10 microg) into the ventral pallidum once a day for 3 days dose-dependently produced a conditioned place aversion when tested in the drug-free state 24 h after the last naloxone injection. This effect was reproduced using the mu-opioid receptor selective agonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTOP, 1 microg). Locomotor activity was reduced following injection of the highest dose of naloxone (10 microg) but elevated following CTOP (1 microg). Daily injection of cocaine (10 mg/kg) for 3 days produced a conditioned place preference 24 h later. This effect of cocaine was attenuated by concomitant intra-ventral pallidal injection of naloxone at a dose (0.01 microg) that had no significant aversive property when injected alone. In contrast, the locomotor activation induced by peripheral cocaine injection was unaffected by naloxone injection into the ventral pallidum. The data implicate endogenous opioid peptide systems within the ventral pallidum as regulators of hedonic status.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rewarding or reinforcing value of many drugs of abuse can be blocked by MOR antagonists injected into the nucleus accumbens, ventral pallidum, or VTA.
“Similarly, the rewarding or reinforcing value of many drugs of abuse can be blocked by MOR antagonists injected into the NAC, the VP, or the VTA (Hiroi and White 1993; Skoubis and Maidment 2003; Soderman and Unterwald 2008).”
From The behavioral, anatomical and pharmacological parallels between social attachment, love and addiction (2012) · cites this paper as Skoubis and Maidment 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 54
- Authors
- Skoubis, P. D., & Maidment, N. T.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Corresponding author
- Maidment, N.T.
- Venue
- Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-06
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 241-249
- ISSN
- 0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032934611
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (T32DA07272, P50DA005010, DA05010, DA-09359, R01DA009359, T32DA007272)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- ventral pallidum, opioid receptors, naloxone, conditioned place aversion, mu-opioid receptor, CTOP, enkephalin, nucleus accumbens, locomotor activity, drug reward
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Animals, Cocaine, Conditioning, Operant, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Interactions, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Male, Motor Activity, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Nucleus Accumbens, Somatostatin, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Receptors, Opioid, mu, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review