Concurrent validity of a brief self-report drug use frequency measure
Abstract
This study examined two sources of concurrent validity information for a brief Drug Use Frequency (DUF) measure--the well-validated Timeline Followback (TLFB) measure and knowledgeable collateral informants (i.e., spouses)--for 106 male alcoholic patients and their female partners (treatment sample couples) and for 130 male and female participants without current alcohol/drug problems (community sample couples). Results showed generally good concurrent validity of self-reported frequency of illicit drug use on the DUF. Treatment sample results showed high correlations (a) between patient self-reported frequency of drug use on the DUF and on the TLFB for all drug types and (b) between self- and collateral reports on the DUF for male patients and their female partners for the most commonly abused drugs (cannabis, cocaine, and heroin). Community sample results showed (a) high correlations between self- and collateral reports on the DUF for male and female participants for frequency of cannabis and cocaine use and (b) average percent agreement of 99% for all drug types on whether or not male and female participants had used each drug.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Timeline Follow Back is a reliable and valid self-report measure of cannabis use.
“The TLFB is a reliable and valid self-report measure of cannabis use (O'Farrell, Fals-Stewart, & Murphy, 2003; Robinson, Sobell, Sobell, & Leo, 2014).”
From Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial (2019) · cites this paper as O'Farrell, Fals-Stewart, & Murphy, 2003
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- O'Farrell, T. J., Fals-Stewart, W., & Murphy, M.
- Affiliations
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- Addictive Behaviors
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-337
- ISSN
- 0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056188883
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K02 AA 00234, R01 AA10356, K02AA000234, R01AA010356)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012189, (R01DA12189)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
- Keywords
- drug use frequency, concurrent validity, self-report measures, timeline follow-back, spouses, alcoholism, couples, cannabis use, cocaine use, heroin use, illicit drug use
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Self-Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review