Cited by 103Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Concurrent validity of a brief self-report drug use frequency measure

O'Farrell, Timothy J, Fals-Stewart, William, Murphy, Marie·2003·Addictive Behaviors

Abstract

This study examined two sources of concurrent validity information for a brief Drug Use Frequency (DUF) measure--the well-validated Timeline Followback (TLFB) measure and knowledgeable collateral informants (i.e., spouses)--for 106 male alcoholic patients and their female partners (treatment sample couples) and for 130 male and female participants without current alcohol/drug problems (community sample couples). Results showed generally good concurrent validity of self-reported frequency of illicit drug use on the DUF. Treatment sample results showed high correlations (a) between patient self-reported frequency of drug use on the DUF and on the TLFB for all drug types and (b) between self- and collateral reports on the DUF for male patients and their female partners for the most commonly abused drugs (cannabis, cocaine, and heroin). Community sample results showed (a) high correlations between self- and collateral reports on the DUF for male and female participants for frequency of cannabis and cocaine use and (b) average percent agreement of 99% for all drug types on whether or not male and female participants had used each drug.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00226-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 103

Authors
O'Farrell, T. J., Fals-Stewart, W., & Murphy, M.
Affiliations
  • University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Addictive Behaviors
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-03
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
327-337
ISSN
0306-4603 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056188883
Cited by
103
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addictive Behaviors (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K02 AA 00234, R01 AA10356, K02AA000234, R01AA010356)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA012189, (R01DA12189)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
drug use frequency, concurrent validity, self-report measures, timeline follow-back, spouses, alcoholism, couples, cannabis use, cocaine use, heroin use, illicit drug use
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Psychometrics, Self-Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review