Cited by 284Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisPlant and soil sciencesAgriculture, Land Use, Rural Development

Sustainability of ecological and conventional agricultural systems in Bangladesh: An assessment based on environmental, economic and social perspectives

Rasul, Golam, Thapa, Gopal B.·2004·Agricultural Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0308-521x(03)00090-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 54 · Cited by 284

Authors
Rasul, G., & Thapa, G. B.
Affiliations
Asian Institute of Technology (TH)
Corresponding author
Rasul, Golam
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
79
Issue
3
Pages
327-351
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048485599
Cited by
284
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant and soil sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Keywords
ecological agriculture, conventional farming, sustainable agriculture, agrochemical use, soil fertility management, crop diversification, pest and disease control, food security, economic feasibility, social acceptance, land degradation, water resource degradation, value addition, Bangladesh

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review