Cited by 29Probiotics and Fermented FoodsFood and Agricultural SciencesProteins in Food Systems

Influence of pasteurization of milk and addition of starter cultures on protein breakdown in ovine cheeses manufactured with extracts from flowers of Cynara cardunculus

Open access
Sousa, M·1996·Food Chemistry

Abstract

Ovine cheeses were manufactured from raw milk (R), pasteurized milk without starter addition (P), and pasteurized milk with starter addition (PS), using in all cases extracts of Cynara cardunculus as rennet and mimicking as far as possible the traditional manufacture process. The microbial counts were higher in R cheeses than in P cheeses, and the lowest microbial counts were found for PS cheeses. Such physicochemical characteristics as moisture, fat, protein, NaCl content, and pH of the three types of cheeses were similar to one another at each sampling time. In particular, pasteurization had no significant effect on protein breakdown as evaluated by either the water-soluble nitrogen, the trichloroacetic-acid (TCA)-soluble nitrogen, or the phosphotungstic acid (PTA)-soluble nitrogen fractions. However, the TCA-soluble and the PTA-soluble fractions for the PS cheeses ripened for more than 28 days were higher than those for the R or P cheeses at similar ripening times. The cheeses and their water-soluble extracts could not be distinguished by urea-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for up to 7 days, but clear differences were apparent at 68 days of ripening for the PS cheeses with respect to the R and P cheeses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0308-8146(96)00190-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cheeses manufactured with raw milk, pasteurised milk without starter or pasteurised milk with starter addition could not be distinguished by urea-PAGE.

    “Sousa and Malcata [51] reported that cheeses manufactured with raw milk, pasteurised milk without starter or pasteurised milk with starter addition could not be distinguished by urea-PAGE;”

    From Advances in the role of a plant coagulant ( <i>Cynara cardunculus</i> ) in vitro and during ripening of cheeses from several milk species (2002) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Abstract says the three cheese types and their water-soluble extracts could not be distinguished by urea-PAGE for up to 7 days. The claim omits that time limit: the Abstract reports clear differences for starter-added cheese at 68 days, and Biochemical analyses describes differing bands at 28 and 68 days. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ovine cheeses manufactured from raw milk exhibited higher microbial counts than those from pasteurised milk without starter addition; however, the lowest microbial counts were recorded in cheese with starter added.

    “Ovine cheeses manufactured from raw milk exhibited higher microbial counts than those from pasteurised milk without starter addition [51]; however, the lowest microbial counts were recorded in cheese with starter added [7,51].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Marth, E. H. (1963). Microbiological and chemical aspects of Cheddar cheese ripening. A review. J. Dairy Sci., 46,869-890.
  2. Thomas, S. B., Egdell, J. W., Clegg, L. F. L. & Cuthbert, W. A. (1950). Thermoduric organisms in milk. Part I. A review of the literature. Proc. Sot. Appl. Bacterial., 13, 27- 64.
  3. Turner, K. W. (1988). Some aspects of the microbiology of cheese ripening investigated using aseptic manufacturing techniques. Ph.D thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, N. Z.

Authors
Sousa, M.
Venue
Food Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
549-556
ISSN
0308-8146 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2161974194
Cited by
29
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
4.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Proteins in Food Systems
Keywords
milk pasteurization, starter cultures, Cynara cardunculus, rennet, protein degradation, cheese ripening, microbial counts, water-soluble nitrogen, cheese proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review