The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management control of interfirm transactional relationships: the case of industrial renovation and maintenance
Open accessAbstract
Abstract This paper is focused on the way in which interfirm relations can be drawn up and controlled. Drawing on contracting theories a model is built of the management control structure of interfirm relationships. The model consists of three control patterns and of contingency factors that influence the choices between the patterns. Particular attention is paid to the role of trust. In building our model we take the perspective of the outsourcer. We try to refine our model by conducting case research in the field of industrial renovation and industrial maintenance. In this field we observed changes in the way outsourcing relationships are controlled. Case research can be very helpful for gaining insights into factors that influence the establishment of control structures of interfirm relationships. By comparing the results of our case research we found institutional, strategic, cultural and historical factors to be of great importance for these control structures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2013) · Management Accounting · doi:10.4324/9780080938943-22 · Cited by 190
Cited by
Emerging themes in management control: A review of recent literature
Berry, A. J., Coad, A. F., Harris, E. P., Otley, D. T., & Stringer, C. (2009) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2008.09.001 · Cited by 508
Chenhall, R. H., & Moers, F. (2015) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2015.10.002 · Cited by 309
Accounting and network coordination
Håkansson, H., & Lind, J. (2004) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00058-2 · Cited by 301
Accounting, network complementarities and the development of inter-organisational relations
Mouritsen, J., & Thrane, S. (2006) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2005.04.002 · Cited by 263
Disembedding the supply chain: institutionalized reflexivity and inter-firm accounting
Seal, W., Berry, A., & Cullen, J. (2004) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00055-7 · Cited by 182
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Vosselman, E. G. J.
- Venue
- Accounting, Organizations and Society
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-77
- ISSN
- 0361-3682 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2120735437
- Cited by
- 460
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management control of interfirm transactional relationships: the case of industrial renovation and maintenance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0361-3682(99)00021-5
- The paper
- van der Meer-Kooistra, J., & Vosselman, E. G. J. (2000). Management control of interfirm transactional relationships: the case of industrial renovation and maintenance. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(99)00021-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
