Male-female differences in rat hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis responses to nicotine stimulation
Abstract
Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis responsiveness differs physiologically and pharmacologically between the sexes (sexual diergism). Central nicotinic receptors modulate this endocrine axis. Previous studies have established that nicotine (NIC) stimulates the HPA axis; however, only male animals have been used. We have demonstrated that plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) concentrations showed greater responsiveness in male than in female rats pretreated with scopolamine (SCOP), a muscarinic antagonist, followed by physostigmine (PHYSO), an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor. These results suggest that the SCOP + PHYSO effects may have resulted from an indirect nicotinic effect caused by increased synaptic acetylcholine with simultaneous muscarinic antagonism. In the present study, we investigated nicotinic cholinergic influences on HPA axis activity in male and female rats by administering NIC (0, 0.03, 0.1, 0.3, or 0.5 mg/kg) and determining plasma AVP, ACTH, and corticosterone (CORT) responses. Male rats had a significantly greater, dose-related AVP response to NIC than did females. In contrast, female rats had significantly greater, dose-related ACTH and CORT responses to NIC than did males. Hormone responses following NIC were similar to hormone responses following SCOP + PHYSO. These results suggest nicotinic receptors influence the HPA axis differentially in male and female rats.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
nAChRs are key in the response to cholinergic stimulation triggered by cholinergic agents including physostigmine.
“studies have since demonstrated that nAChRs were key in the response to cholinergic stimulation triggered by cholinergic agents including physostigmine (Rhodes et al., 2001).”
From It is not “either/or”: Activation and desensitization of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors both contribute to behaviors related to nicotine addiction and mood (2008) · cites this paper as Rhodes et al., 2001
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Rhodes, M. E., O’Toole, S. M., Czambel, R. K., & Rubin, R. T.
- Affiliations
- Allegheny General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rhodes, Michael E
- Venue
- Brain Research Bulletin
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 681-688
- ISSN
- 0361-9230 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986867990
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research Bulletin (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k05mh047363-14)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH028380, MH28380, MH 47363)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, nicotine, sex differences, nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, vasopressin, ACTH, corticosterone, scopolamine, physostigmine, muscarinic antagonism, acetylcholine, rats
- MeSH terms
- Adrenocorticotropic Hormone, Animals, Arginine Vasopressin, Behavior, Animal, Cortisone, Female, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Nicotine, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Receptors, Nicotinic, Sex Characteristics, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Nicotinic Agonists, Rats
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review