The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reputation management: the new face of corporate public relations?
Open accessAbstract
An empirical study of Fortune 500 companies suggests that “reputation management” is gaining ground as a driving philosophy behind corporate public relations. Whether the phenomenon is a trend or a fad is not clear, given the lack of consensus in defining reputation, the instability and questionable validity of reputation measures, and unanswered questions about when and how (or even whether) reputation can be “managed.” Besides reputation management, corporate public relations departments in the study embraced a wide variety of other definitions of their function, suggesting that public relations continues to have great difficulty in defining itself. While the study did not find a strong correlation between reputation and overall spending on corporate communication activities, as had a similar study the prior year, it did find some interesting correlations between reputation and specific categories of spending.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2 · Cited by 1,024
Orazi, D. C., & Chan, E. Y. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4028-6 · Cited by 84
Internal communication for employee enablement: Strategies in American and Italian companies
Mazzei, A. (2014) · Corporate Communications: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/ccij-08-2012-0060 · Cited by 78
The Intractability of Reputation: Media Coverage as a Complex System in the Case of Martha Stewart
Murphy, P. (2010) · Journal of Public Relations Research · doi:10.1080/10627261003601648 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutton, J. G., Goodman, M. B., Alexander, J. B., & Genest, C. M.
- Venue
- Public Relations Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 247-261
- ISSN
- 0363-8111 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032218291
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.