The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Perceiving temporal regularity in music
Abstract
Abstract We address how listeners perceive temporal regularity in music performances, which are rich in temporal irregularities. A computational model is described in which a small system of internal self‐sustained oscillations, operating at different periods with specific phase and period relations, entrains to the rhythms of music performances. Based on temporal expectancies embodied by the oscillations, the model predicts the categorization of temporally changing event intervals into discrete metrical categories, as well as the perceptual salience of deviations from these categories. The model's predictions are tested in two experiments using piano performances of the same music with different phrase structure interpretations (Experiment 1) or different melodic interpretations (Experiment 2). The model successfully tracked temporal regularity amidst the temporal fluctuations found in the performances. The model's sensitivity to performed deviations from its temporal expectations compared favorably with the performers' structural (phrasal and melodic) intentions. Furthermore, the model tracked normal performances (with increased temporal variability) better than performances in which temporal fluctuations associated with individual voices were removed (with decreased variability). The small, systematic temporal irregularities characteristic of human performances (chord asynchronies) improved tracking, but randomly generated temporal irregularities did not. These findings suggest that perception of temporal regularity in complex musical sequences is based on temporal expectancies that adapt in response to temporally fluctuating input.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1980.0020 · Cited by 6,510
Cited by
When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L., & Penhune, V. B. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2152 · Cited by 1,754
Joint drumming: Social context facilitates synchronization in preschool children
Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.07.005 · Cited by 494
Metrical Categories in Infancy and Adulthood
Hannon, E. E., & Trehub, S. E. (2005) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00779.x · Cited by 441
Impairment of beat-based rhythm discrimination in Parkinson's disease
Grahn, J. A., & Brett, M. (2009) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2008.01.005 · Cited by 340
Neural Mechanisms of Rhythm Perception: Current Findings and Future Perspectives
Grahn, J. A. (2012) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01213.x · Cited by 261
Metadata
- Authors
- Large, E.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-02
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-37
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086998143
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceiving temporal regularity in music. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(01)00057-x
- The paper
- Large, E. (2002). Perceiving temporal regularity in music. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(01)00057-x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.