The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal reasoning in medicine: Analysis of a protocol
Open accessAbstract
The ability to identify and represent the knowledge that a human expert has about a particular domain is a key method in the creation of an expert computer system. The first part of this paper demonstrates a methodology for collecting and analyzing observations of experts at work, in order to find the conceptual framework used for the particular domain. The second part develops a representation for qualitative knowledge of the structure and behavior of a mechanism. The qualitative simulation, or envisionment, process is given a qualitative structural description of a mechanism and some initialization information, and produces a detailed description of the mechanism's behavior. The simulation process has been fully implemented, and its results are shown for a particular disease mechanisms in nephrology. This vertical slice of the construction of a cognitive model demonstrates an effective knowledge acquisition method for the purpose of determining the structure of the representation itself, not simply the content of the knowledge to be encoded in that representation. Most importantly, it demonstrates the interaction among constraints derived from the textbook knowledge of the domain, from observations of the human expert, and from the computational requirements of successful performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317
Cited by
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Schwartz, W. B., Patil, R. S., & Szolovits, P. (1987) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198703123161109 · Cited by 152
What goes around comes around: Return of the hypothetico-deductive strategy
Elstein, A. (1994) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401339409539658 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- KUIPERS, B., & KASSIRER, J.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1984-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 363-385
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087037929
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal reasoning in medicine: Analysis of a protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0364-0213(84)80007-5
- The paper
- KUIPERS, B., & KASSIRER, J. (1984). Causal reasoning in medicine: Analysis of a protocol. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0364-0213(84)80007-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.