The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking
Open accessAbstract
The breaking of electroweak symmetry, and origin of the associated “weak scale,” vweak = 1/ q 2 √ 2GF = 175 GeV, may be due to a new strong interaction. Theoretical developments over the past decade have led to viable models and mechanisms that are consistent with current experimental data. Many of these schemes feature a privileged role for the top quark, and third generation, and are natural in the context of theories of extra space dimensions at the weak scale. We review various models and their phenomenological implications which will be subject to definitive tests in future collider runs at the Tevatron, and the LHC, and future linear e + e − colliders, as well as sensitive
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bardeen, J., Cooper, L. N., & Schrieffer, J. R. (1957) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1175 · Cited by 13,213
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Weinberg, S. (1967) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.19.1264 · Cited by 7,451
An Alternative to Compactification
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.4690 · Cited by 7,217
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Particle Data Group, Workman, R. L., Burkert, V. D., Crede, V, Klempt, E., Thoma, U., Tiator, L., Agashe, K., Aielli, G., Allanach, B. C., et al. (2022) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptac097 · Cited by 5,964
Dynamical Model of Elementary Particles Based on an Analogy with Superconductivity. I
Nambu, Y., & Jona-Lasinio, G. (1961) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.122.345 · Cited by 5,501
The renormalization group and the ε expansion
Wilson, K. (1974) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(74)90023-4 · Cited by 5,179
Amsler, C., Doser, M., Antonelli, M., Asner, D. M., Babu, K. S., Baer, H., Band, H. R., Barnett, R. M., Bergren, E., Beringer, J., et al. (2008) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.07.018 · Cited by 5,065
Partial-symmetries of weak interactions
Glashow, S. L. (1961) · Nuclear Physics · doi:10.1016/0029-5582(61)90469-2 · Cited by 4,806
Cited by
Dark Matter Candidates from Particle Physics and Methods of Detection
Feng, J. L. (2010) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101659 · Cited by 1,448
CMS Physics Technical Design Report, Volume II: Physics Performance
Collaboration, T. C. (2007) · Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics · doi:10.1088/0954-3899/34/6/s01 · Cited by 940
Metadata
- Authors
- Hill, C. T., & Simmons, E. H.
- Venue
- Physics Reports
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 381
- Issue
- 4-6
- Pages
- 235-402
- ISSN
- 0370-1573 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165907756
- Cited by
- 892
- References
- 145
- FWCI
- 20.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00140-6
- The paper
- Hill, C. T., & Simmons, E. H. (2003). Strong dynamics and electroweak symmetry breaking. Physics Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-1573(03)00140-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
