The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Does LEP prefer the NMSSM?
Open accessAbstract
We study the naturalness of electroweak symmetry breaking and baryogenesis in the next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model (NMSSM). Our study is motivated by the recent LEP bounds on the Higgs boson mass which severely constrains the low tanβ region of the minimal supersymmetric standard model (MSSM). We show that the low tanβ region of the NMSSM is clearly favoured over the MSSM with regard to the physical Higgs boson mass, fine-tuning, and electroweak baryogenesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Next-to-Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model
Ellwanger, U., Hugonie, C., & Teixeira, A. M. (2010) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.07.001 · Cited by 992
Self-citationEllwanger, U., & Hugonie, C. (2006) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2006.04.004 · Cited by 406
Self-citationBaryogenesis in the two-Higgs doublet model
Fromme, L., Huber, S. J., & Seniuch, M. (2006) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/11/038 · Cited by 264
Supersymmetric origin of matter
Balázs, C., Carena, M., Menon, A., Morrissey, D. E., & Wagner, C. E. M. (2005) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.71.075002 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Bastero-Gil, M., Hugonie, C., King, S. F., Roy, D. P., & Vempati, S.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-09
- Volume
- 489
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 359-366
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1789796604
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Does LEP prefer the NMSSM? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00930-8
- The paper
- Bastero-Gil, M., Hugonie, C., King, S. F., Roy, D. P., & Vempati, S. (2000). Does LEP prefer the NMSSM? Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(00)00930-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
