The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collider versus cosmic ray sensitivity to black hole production
Open accessAbstract
In scenarios with extra dimensions and TeV-scale quantum gravity, black holes are expected to be produced copiously at center-of-mass energies above the fundamental Planck scale. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) may thus turn into a factory of black holes, at which their production and evaporation may be studied in detail. But even before the LHC starts operating, the Pierre Auger Observatory for cosmic rays, presently under construction, has an opportunity to search for black hole signatures. Black hole production in the scattering of ultrahigh energy cosmic neutrinos on nucleons in the atmosphere may initiate quasi-horizontal air showers with distinct characteristics above the Standard Model rate. In this Letter, we compare the sensitivity of LHC and Auger to black hole production by studying their respective reach in black hole production parameter space. Moreover, we present constraints in this parameter space from the non-observation of horizontal showers by the Fly's Eye Collaboration. We find that if the ultrahigh energy neutrino flux is at the level expected from cosmic ray interactions with the cosmic microwave background radiation, Auger has only a small window of opportunity to detect black holes before the start of the LHC. If, on the other hand, larger ultrahigh energy neutrino fluxes on the level of the upper limit from “hidden” hadronic astrophysical sources are realized in nature, then the first signs of black hole production may be observed at Auger. Moreover, in this case, the Fly's Eye constraints, although more model-dependent, turn out to be competitive with other currently available constraints on TeV-scale gravity which are mainly based on interactions associated with Kaluza–Klein gravitons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Particle creation by black holes
Hawking, S. W. (1975) · Communications In Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02345020 · Cited by 13,106
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
The hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter
Arkani–Hamed, N., Dimopoulos, S., & Dvali, G. (1998) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00466-3 · Cited by 6,563
Cited by
BLACK HOLES IN THEORIES WITH LARGE EXTRA DIMENSIONS: A REVIEW
KANTI, P. (2004) · International Journal of Modern Physics A · doi:10.1142/s0217751x04018324 · Cited by 403
Signatures in the Planck regime
Hossenfelder, S., Bleicher, M., Hofmann, S., Ruppert, J., Scherer, S., & Stöcker, H. (2003) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.09.040 · Cited by 305
Hawking radiation from a (4+ n )-dimensional black hole: exact results for the Schwarzschild phase
Harris, C. M., & Kanti, P. (2003) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2003/10/014 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Ringwald, A., & Tu, H.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 525
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 135-142
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087927249
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 18.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collider versus cosmic ray sensitivity to black hole production. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01421-6
- The paper
- Ringwald, A., & Tu, H. (2002). Collider versus cosmic ray sensitivity to black hole production. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01421-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.