Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Improved exclusion limits from the EDELWEISS WIMP search

Open access
Benoit, A, Bergé, L, Broniatowski, A, Chabert, L, Chambon, B, Chapellier, M, Chardin, G, Charvin, P, De Jésus, M, Di Stefano, P, Drain, D, Dumoulin, L, Gascon, J, Gerbier, G, Gerlic, E, Goldbach, C, Goyot, M, Gros, M, Hadjout, J.P, Hervé, S, Juillard, A, de Lesquen, A, Loidl, M, Mallet, J, Marnieros, S, Martineau, O, Mirabolfathi, N, Mosca, L, Navick, X.-F, Nollez, G, Pari, P, Riccio, C, Sanglard, V, Stern, M, Vagneron, L·2002·Physics Letters B

Abstract

Abstract The EDELWEISS experiment has improved its sensitivity for the direct search for WIMP dark matter. In the recoil energy range relevant for WIMP masses below 10 TeV/ c 2 , no nuclear recoils were observed in the fiducial volume of a heat-and-ionization cryogenic Ge detector operated in the low-background environment of the Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane in the Frejus Tunnel, during an effective exposure of 7.4 kg d. This result is combined with the previous EDELWEISS data to derive a limit on the cross-section for spin-independent interaction of WIMPs and nucleons as a function of WIMP mass, using standard nuclear physics and astrophysical assumptions. This limit excludes at more than 99.8% CL a WIMP candidate with a mass of 44 GeV/ c 2 and a cross-section of 5.4×10 −6 pb, as reported by the DAMA Collaboration. A first sample of supersymmetric models are also excluded at 90% CL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02238-4

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Benoit, A., Bergé, L., Broniatowski, A., Chabert, L., Chambon, B., Chapellier, M., Chardin, G., Charvin, P., De Jésus, M., Di Stefano, P., Drain, D., Dumoulin, L., Gascon, J., Gerbier, G., Gerlic, E., Goldbach, C., Goyot, M., Gros, M., Hadjout, J. P., Hervé, S., Juillard, A., de Lesquen, A., Loidl, M., Mallet, J., Marnieros, S., Martineau, O., Mirabolfathi, N., Mosca, L., Navick, X.-F., Nollez, G., Pari, P., Riccio, C., Sanglard, V, Stern, M., & Vagneron, L.
Venue
Physics Letters B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
545
Issue
1-2
Pages
43-49
ISSN
0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2004800575
Cited by
206
References
0
FWCI
25.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved exclusion limits from the EDELWEISS WIMP search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02238-4
The paper
Benoit, A., Bergé, L., Broniatowski, A., Chabert, L., Chambon, B., Chapellier, M., Chardin, G., Charvin, P., De Jésus, M., Di Stefano, P., Drain, D., Dumoulin, L., Gascon, J., Gerbier, G., Gerlic, E., Goldbach, C., Goyot, M., Gros, M., Hadjout, J. P., . . . Vagneron, L. (2002). Improved exclusion limits from the EDELWEISS WIMP search. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(02)02238-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.