Strings, branes and two-time physics
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Using the procedure, the Schrödinger equation and other equations corresponding to first quantized field equations for the systems in figure 1 follow from (13).
“Using this procedure, it was shown in [11] that the Schrödinger equation and other equations that correspond to the first quantized field equations for the systems in figure 1 follow from (13).”
From Survey of two-time physics (2001) · cites this paper as [11]
The Introduction (p. 2) describes non-relativistic particles among the systems obtained by gauge fixing, and Basic Formalism (p. 5) says their equations of motion reduce to the expected equations. Our copy does not specifically say that this procedure yields the Schrödinger equation or other first-quantized field equations from equation (13). (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe interaction has the same form as (14) in the gauge that corresponds to the relativistic massless particle in figure 1, but can be more involved in other gauges.
“The interaction has the same form as (14) in the gauge that corresponds to the relativistic massless particle in figure 1, but can be more involved in other gauges (for examples see [11]).”
From Survey of two-time physics (2001) · cites this paper as [11]
The equations in (11) together with X^2=0 are the kinematical equations for the Yang-Mills and gravitational fields, while the dynamical equations, including interactions, follow from a Lagrangian as given in [11].
“One finds that the equations in (11) together with X 2 = 0 are the kinematical equations for the Yang-Mills and gravitational fields, while the dynamical equations, including interactions, follow from a Lagrangian as given in [11].”
From Survey of two-time physics (2001) · cites this paper as [11]
Section 2 (p. 4) discusses constraints for a spinless-particle model and says extensions to curved spacetime and background gauge fields will be discussed elsewhere. Searches for kinematical Yang–Mills and gravitational field equations, and for interacting dynamical equations derived from a Lagrangian, found no passage in our copy establishing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- [1][1] I. Bars, C. Deliduman and O. Andreev, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 066004, hep-th/9803188. - · arXiv
- [2][2] I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 066006, hep-th/9804028. - · arXiv
- [3][3] I. Bars and C. Deliduman, Phys. Rev. D58 (1998) 106004, hep-th/9806085. - · arXiv
- [4][4] I. Bars, 'Two-time Physics', hep-th/9809034; in the proceedings of the XXIIIrd Int. Colloq. on Group Theor. Methods in Physics, Hobart, Australia, July 1998. - · arXiv
- [5][5] I. Bars, Phys. Rev. D59 (1999) 045019, hep-th/9810025. - · arXiv
- [6][6] I. Bars, C. Deliduman and D. Minic, Phys. Rev. D59 ( 1999 ) 125004, hep-th/9812161. - · arXiv
- [7][7] I. Bars, hep-th/9604200 and hep-th/9608061; Phys. Rev. D54 (1996) 5203; Phys. lett. B403 (1997) 257; Phys. Rev. D55 (1997) 2373. - · arXiv
- [11][11] I. Bars and C. Deliduman, Phys. Rev. D56 (1997) 6579; hep-th/9710066. - · arXiv
- [12][12] I. Bars, C. Deliduman and D. Minic, hep-th/9904063. - · arXiv
- [15][15] J. Maldacena, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231, or hep-th/9711200. - · arXiv
- [17][17] E. Witten, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253, or hep-th/9802150. - · arXiv
- [19][19] D. Berenstein, R. Corrado, W. Fischler and J. Maldacena, hep-th/9809188. - · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bars, I. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/16/303 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bars, I., Deliduman, C., & Minic, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Southern California (US)
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 466
- Issue
- 2-4
- Pages
- 135-143
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065794395
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Physics Letters B (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- two-time physics, p-branes, tensionless strings, gauge fixing, dual action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
