The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bulk gauge fields in the Randall–Sundrum model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract We explore the consequences of placing the Standard Model gauge fields in the bulk of the recently proposed localized gravity model of Randall and Sundrum. We find that the Kaluza–Klein excitations of these fields are necessarily strongly coupled and we demonstrate that current precision electroweak data constrain the lowest states to lie above ≃23 TeV. Taking the weak scale to be ∼1 TeV, the resulting implications on the model parameters force the bulk curvature, R5, to be larger than the higher dimensional Planck scale, M, violating the consistency of the theory. In turn, to preserve |R5|≲M2, the weak scale must be pushed to ≳100 TeV. Hence we conclude that it is disfavored to place the Standard Model gauge fields in the bulk of this model as it is presently formulated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Large Mass Hierarchy from a Small Extra Dimension
Randall, L., & Sundrum, R. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.3370 · Cited by 9,227
Strong coupling expansion of Calabi-Yau compactification
Witten, E. (1996) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(96)00190-3 · Cited by 950
Production of Kaluza-Klein states at future colliders
Antoniadis, I., Benakli, K., & Quirós, M. (1994) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)91058-8 · Cited by 307
Cosmological constraints on theories with large extra dimensions
Hall, L. J., & Smith, D. (1999) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.60.085008 · Cited by 231
Direct collider signatures of large extra dimensions
Ignatios Antoniadis, A., Benakli, K., & Mariano Quirós, C. (1999) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(99)00764-9 · Cited by 158
More and more indirect signals for extra dimensions at more and more colliders
Rizzo, T. G. (1999) · Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields · doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.115010 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Cited by
Bellazzini, B., Csáki, C., & Serra, J. (2014) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2766-x · Cited by 322
Warped/composite phenomenology simplified
Contino, R., Kramer, T., Son, M., & Sundrum, R. (2007) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2007/05/074 · Cited by 300
Warped gravitons at the CERN LHC and beyond
Agashe, K., Davoudiasl, H., Perez, G., & Soni, A. (2007) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.76.036006 · Cited by 253
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Davoudiasl, H., Hewett, J. L., & Rizzo, T. G.
- Venue
- Physics Letters B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 473
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 43-49
- ISSN
- 0370-2693 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2158236748
- Cited by
- 459
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 20.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bulk gauge fields in the Randall–Sundrum model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0370-2693(99)01430-6
- The paper
- Davoudiasl, H., Hewett, J. L., & Rizzo, T. G. (2000). Bulk gauge fields in the Randall–Sundrum model. Physics Letters B. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(99)01430-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
